[The possibilities of scientific education through the scientific articles of Budapest papers in the second half of the 19th century].

Orvostorteneti kozlemenyek Pub Date : 2004-01-01
Katalin Szabó
{"title":"[The possibilities of scientific education through the scientific articles of Budapest papers in the second half of the 19th century].","authors":"Katalin Szabó","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enlightenment in health issues has always been a structural part of the generally meant healing activities. The ways of addressing the people changed along with the centuries: the press was the right medium to inform wide masses of different classes of people in the 19th century. The feuilleton was one of the popular styles used by the press, nevertheless it grew out of it's classical frames, and gained the most various themes during the second half of the century. So the feuilletons on natural sciences written by medical doctors about health issues appeared as well. These writings represent the natural sciences' knowledge of the comfortable and popular sort of positivism and national program spanning from Zsigmond Kemény to Eötvös, where the reader has to feel it's practical use in the everyday life. It is the scientific knowledge that is interpreted through these feuilletons on the first place, but on the other hand a specific way of reception of natural sciences can be traced by them. Their particularity lies at the intersection of the most possible subjective description of the objective facts: possible historical readings of medical, literary and social sciences. This paper tries to catch these moments through the feuilletons of István Apáthy, Tihamér Balogh and Miklós Dubay.</p>","PeriodicalId":82240,"journal":{"name":"Orvostorteneti kozlemenyek","volume":"49 3-4","pages":"107-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvostorteneti kozlemenyek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enlightenment in health issues has always been a structural part of the generally meant healing activities. The ways of addressing the people changed along with the centuries: the press was the right medium to inform wide masses of different classes of people in the 19th century. The feuilleton was one of the popular styles used by the press, nevertheless it grew out of it's classical frames, and gained the most various themes during the second half of the century. So the feuilletons on natural sciences written by medical doctors about health issues appeared as well. These writings represent the natural sciences' knowledge of the comfortable and popular sort of positivism and national program spanning from Zsigmond Kemény to Eötvös, where the reader has to feel it's practical use in the everyday life. It is the scientific knowledge that is interpreted through these feuilletons on the first place, but on the other hand a specific way of reception of natural sciences can be traced by them. Their particularity lies at the intersection of the most possible subjective description of the objective facts: possible historical readings of medical, literary and social sciences. This paper tries to catch these moments through the feuilletons of István Apáthy, Tihamér Balogh and Miklós Dubay.

[从19世纪下半叶布达佩斯论文中的科学文章看科学教育的可能性]。
健康问题的启蒙一直是通常意义上的治疗活动的一个结构部分。与人们交谈的方式随着世纪的变化而变化:在19世纪,新闻界是向不同阶层的广大群众提供信息的正确媒介。福伊尔顿是新闻界使用的流行风格之一,然而,它是从它的经典框架中发展出来的,并在20世纪下半叶获得了最多样化的主题。因此,由医生撰写的关于健康问题的自然科学指南也出现了。这些作品代表了自然科学知识的舒适和流行的实证主义和国家计划,从Zsigmond kem姆尼到Eötvös,读者必须感受到它在日常生活中的实际应用。首先,科学知识是通过这些feuilleton来解释的,但另一方面,接受自然科学的一种特殊方式可以通过它们来追踪。它们的特殊性在于对客观事实的最可能的主观描述的交叉点:对医学、文学和社会科学的可能的历史解读。本文试图通过István Apáthy、tihamsamir Balogh和Miklós dubai等网站来捕捉这些瞬间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信