Inactivated- or killed-virus HIV/AIDS vaccines.

Haynes W Sheppard
{"title":"Inactivated- or killed-virus HIV/AIDS vaccines.","authors":"Haynes W Sheppard","doi":"10.2174/1568005054201599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inactivated or \"killed\" virus (KV) is a \"classical\" approach that has produced safe and effective human and veterinary vaccines but has received relatively little attention in the effort to develop an HIV/AIDS vaccine. Initially, KV and rgp120 subunit vaccines were the two most obvious approaches but, unfortunately, rgp120 has not been efficacious and the KV approach has been limited by a variety of scientific, technical, and sociological factors. For example, when responses to cellular antigens, present on SIV grown in human cells, proved to be largely responsible for efficacy, the KV approach was widely discounted. Similarly, when lab-adapted HIV-1 appeared to lose envelope glycoprotein during preparation (not the case for primary isolates), this was viewed as a fundamental barrier to the KV concept. Also, a preference for \"safer\", genetically-engineered vaccines, and emphasis on cellular immunity, have left KV low on the priority list for funding agencies and investigators. The recent suggestion that \"native\" trimeric gp120 displays conserved conformational neutralization epitopes, along with the failure of rgp120, and difficulties in raising strong cellular responses with DNA or vectored vaccines, has restored some interest in the KV concept. In the past 15 years, several groups have initiated pre-clinical development of KV candidates for SIV or HIV and promising, albeit limited, information has been produced. In this chapter we discuss the rationale (including pros and cons) for producing and testing killed-HIV vaccines, the prospects for success, the nature and scope of research needed to test the KV concept, what has been learned to date, and what remains undone.</p>","PeriodicalId":84525,"journal":{"name":"Current drug targets. Infectious disorders","volume":"5 2","pages":"131-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1568005054201599","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug targets. Infectious disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1568005054201599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Inactivated or "killed" virus (KV) is a "classical" approach that has produced safe and effective human and veterinary vaccines but has received relatively little attention in the effort to develop an HIV/AIDS vaccine. Initially, KV and rgp120 subunit vaccines were the two most obvious approaches but, unfortunately, rgp120 has not been efficacious and the KV approach has been limited by a variety of scientific, technical, and sociological factors. For example, when responses to cellular antigens, present on SIV grown in human cells, proved to be largely responsible for efficacy, the KV approach was widely discounted. Similarly, when lab-adapted HIV-1 appeared to lose envelope glycoprotein during preparation (not the case for primary isolates), this was viewed as a fundamental barrier to the KV concept. Also, a preference for "safer", genetically-engineered vaccines, and emphasis on cellular immunity, have left KV low on the priority list for funding agencies and investigators. The recent suggestion that "native" trimeric gp120 displays conserved conformational neutralization epitopes, along with the failure of rgp120, and difficulties in raising strong cellular responses with DNA or vectored vaccines, has restored some interest in the KV concept. In the past 15 years, several groups have initiated pre-clinical development of KV candidates for SIV or HIV and promising, albeit limited, information has been produced. In this chapter we discuss the rationale (including pros and cons) for producing and testing killed-HIV vaccines, the prospects for success, the nature and scope of research needed to test the KV concept, what has been learned to date, and what remains undone.

灭活或灭活艾滋病毒/艾滋病疫苗。
灭活病毒或“灭活”病毒(KV)是一种“经典”方法,已经生产出安全有效的人类和兽医疫苗,但在开发艾滋病毒/艾滋病疫苗的努力中受到的关注相对较少。最初,KV和rgp120亚单位疫苗是两种最明显的方法,但不幸的是,rgp120并不有效,而KV方法受到各种科学、技术和社会学因素的限制。例如,当对人类细胞中生长的SIV上存在的细胞抗原的反应被证明是产生疗效的主要原因时,KV方法被广泛低估。同样,当实验室适应的HIV-1在制备过程中出现包膜糖蛋白丢失时(初级分离株的情况并非如此),这被视为KV概念的根本障碍。此外,对“更安全”的基因工程疫苗的偏爱,以及对细胞免疫的强调,使得KV在资助机构和研究人员的优先名单上排名较低。最近的研究表明,“天然”三聚体gp120显示保守的构象中和表位,以及rgp120的失败,以及与DNA或载体疫苗引起强烈细胞反应的困难,使人们对KV概念恢复了一些兴趣。在过去的15年里,几个小组已经开始了针对SIV或HIV的KV候选药物的临床前开发,并且已经产生了有希望的(尽管有限的)信息。在本章中,我们将讨论生产和测试灭活艾滋病毒疫苗的基本原理(包括赞成和反对)、成功的前景、测试KV概念所需的研究的性质和范围、迄今为止学到的知识以及尚未完成的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信