Letter processing interferes with inhibition of return: Evidence for cortical involvement

Ben Bowles, Susanne Ferber, Jay Pratt
{"title":"Letter processing interferes with inhibition of return: Evidence for cortical involvement","authors":"Ben Bowles,&nbsp;Susanne Ferber,&nbsp;Jay Pratt","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that, when the time lag between a cue and a target is prolonged, the reaction to the target, when it eventually appears, is actually slower than with no cue. This phenomenon is thought to make visual search more efficient, and it is subserved by the left inferior parietal cortex and the </span>supramarginal gyrus bilaterally. Interestingly, the very same brain structures are also involved in letter processing. Accordingly, we asked whether the two mental processes interfere with each other when simultaneously probed. The first experiment used a typical IOR procedure, but the cue/target placeholders were either simple geometric shapes or English letters. The results show that, although IOR is approximately the same across visual fields when shape placeholders are used, it is significantly lessened in the right visual field when letters are used as cue and target placeholders. To examine if this finding was due to potential spatial frequency differences between the placeholders, a second experiment using shapes and Japanese letters was conducted, and no differences in IOR were found. The supramarginal gyrus appears to be the most likely locus for the letter-IOR interference effect because it is active bilaterally in IOR, but only in the left hemisphere during letter processing. These findings provide support for the notion that IOR is not simply due to subcortical processes but also involves processing from cortical structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.005","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005001114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that, when the time lag between a cue and a target is prolonged, the reaction to the target, when it eventually appears, is actually slower than with no cue. This phenomenon is thought to make visual search more efficient, and it is subserved by the left inferior parietal cortex and the supramarginal gyrus bilaterally. Interestingly, the very same brain structures are also involved in letter processing. Accordingly, we asked whether the two mental processes interfere with each other when simultaneously probed. The first experiment used a typical IOR procedure, but the cue/target placeholders were either simple geometric shapes or English letters. The results show that, although IOR is approximately the same across visual fields when shape placeholders are used, it is significantly lessened in the right visual field when letters are used as cue and target placeholders. To examine if this finding was due to potential spatial frequency differences between the placeholders, a second experiment using shapes and Japanese letters was conducted, and no differences in IOR were found. The supramarginal gyrus appears to be the most likely locus for the letter-IOR interference effect because it is active bilaterally in IOR, but only in the left hemisphere during letter processing. These findings provide support for the notion that IOR is not simply due to subcortical processes but also involves processing from cortical structures.

字母处理干扰返回抑制:皮层参与的证据
返回抑制(IOR)指的是,当线索和目标之间的时间间隔延长时,对目标的反应,当目标最终出现时,实际上比没有线索时慢。这种现象被认为使视觉搜索更有效,它是由左侧顶叶下皮层和边缘上回双侧控制的。有趣的是,同样的大脑结构也参与了字母处理。因此,我们问,当同时探测时,这两种心理过程是否会相互干扰。第一个实验使用了典型的IOR程序,但线索/目标占位符要么是简单的几何形状,要么是英文字母。结果表明,虽然使用形状占位符时的IOR在整个视野中大致相同,但当使用字母作为线索和目标占位符时,在右视野中IOR显著降低。为了检查这一发现是否由于占位符之间潜在的空间频率差异,使用形状和日语字母进行了第二次实验,没有发现IOR的差异。边缘上回似乎是最有可能的字母-IOR干扰效应的位点,因为它在IOR中是双侧活跃的,但在字母处理过程中只在左半球活跃。这些发现支持IOR不仅仅是由于皮层下的过程,还涉及皮层结构的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信