Concomitant use of policosanol and beta-blockers in older patients.

G Castaño, R Mas, R Gámez, J Fernández, J Illnait, L Fernández, S Mendoza, M Mesa, J A Gutiérrez, E López
{"title":"Concomitant use of policosanol and beta-blockers in older patients.","authors":"G Castaño,&nbsp;R Mas,&nbsp;R Gámez,&nbsp;J Fernández,&nbsp;J Illnait,&nbsp;L Fernández,&nbsp;S Mendoza,&nbsp;M Mesa,&nbsp;J A Gutiérrez,&nbsp;E López","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policosanol is a cholesterol-lowering drug with concomitant antiplatelet effects. It is safe and well tolerated, even in populations with high consumption of concomitant drugs. These data suggest that adverse events (AE) due to drug-to-drug interactions (DDI) with policosanol are not relevant. Experimental data indicate that potential DDI between policosanol and drugs metabolized through the cytochrome P450 hepatic system are not expected, but pharmacodynamic DDI cannot be excluded. Several clinical studies have shown that policosanol decreased arterial pressure compared with placebo, and a pharmacological interaction with beta-blockers was experimentally proven. Therefore, clinical DDI between policosanol and beta-blockers can be expected. This study investigated whether policosanol reinforces the antihypertensive effects of beta-blockers and/or whether this combination impairs some safety indicators or induces specific AE in older patients. After 5 weeks on a diet-only baseline period, 205 older hypercholesterolemic patients taking beta-blockers were randomized to policosanol 5 mg/day or placebo for 3 years. After 1 year on therapy, policosanol significantly reduced (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (20.9%), total cholesterol (TC) (19.3%) and triglycerides (TG) (25.7%), whereas it increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 versus placebo) high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (4.1%). Treatment effects did not to wear off during the 3-year follow-up. At study completion, policosanol lowered (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) LDL-C (34.3%), TC (23.2%) and TG (21.2%) and raised (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) HDL-C (12.3%). Thirty-one patients (15.1%) discontinued the study, 22 in the placebo group (20.6%) and nine in the policosanol group (9.2%). Of these, 20 patients (16 in the placebo group and four in the policosanol group) withdrew from the study due to AE. The frequency of serious adverse events (SAE), mostly vascular, in policosanol patients (3/98, 3.1%) was lower than in the placebo group (15/107, 14.0%). No impairment of safety indicators was observed. Nevertheless, reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed in policosanol patients compared with those in the placebo group. The frequency of policosanol patients reporting mild or moderate AE (18/98, 18.4%) was also lower than in the placebo group (30/107, 28.0%). In conclusion, policosanol was well tolerated in elderly patients taking beta-block- ers and did not increase AE. Additional reduction of blood pressure and a lower frequency of SAE were observed in policosanol patients compared with those taking placebo. The cholesterol-lowering efficacy of policosanol was that expected. These results provide support that policosanol therapy added to hypercholesterolemic elderly individuals taking beta-blockers could provide additional benefits in lowering blood pressure; SAE were not more frequent in the policosanol group than in the placebo group and there was no increase in AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"24 2-3","pages":"65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policosanol is a cholesterol-lowering drug with concomitant antiplatelet effects. It is safe and well tolerated, even in populations with high consumption of concomitant drugs. These data suggest that adverse events (AE) due to drug-to-drug interactions (DDI) with policosanol are not relevant. Experimental data indicate that potential DDI between policosanol and drugs metabolized through the cytochrome P450 hepatic system are not expected, but pharmacodynamic DDI cannot be excluded. Several clinical studies have shown that policosanol decreased arterial pressure compared with placebo, and a pharmacological interaction with beta-blockers was experimentally proven. Therefore, clinical DDI between policosanol and beta-blockers can be expected. This study investigated whether policosanol reinforces the antihypertensive effects of beta-blockers and/or whether this combination impairs some safety indicators or induces specific AE in older patients. After 5 weeks on a diet-only baseline period, 205 older hypercholesterolemic patients taking beta-blockers were randomized to policosanol 5 mg/day or placebo for 3 years. After 1 year on therapy, policosanol significantly reduced (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (20.9%), total cholesterol (TC) (19.3%) and triglycerides (TG) (25.7%), whereas it increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 versus placebo) high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (4.1%). Treatment effects did not to wear off during the 3-year follow-up. At study completion, policosanol lowered (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) LDL-C (34.3%), TC (23.2%) and TG (21.2%) and raised (p < 0.00001 versus placebo) HDL-C (12.3%). Thirty-one patients (15.1%) discontinued the study, 22 in the placebo group (20.6%) and nine in the policosanol group (9.2%). Of these, 20 patients (16 in the placebo group and four in the policosanol group) withdrew from the study due to AE. The frequency of serious adverse events (SAE), mostly vascular, in policosanol patients (3/98, 3.1%) was lower than in the placebo group (15/107, 14.0%). No impairment of safety indicators was observed. Nevertheless, reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed in policosanol patients compared with those in the placebo group. The frequency of policosanol patients reporting mild or moderate AE (18/98, 18.4%) was also lower than in the placebo group (30/107, 28.0%). In conclusion, policosanol was well tolerated in elderly patients taking beta-block- ers and did not increase AE. Additional reduction of blood pressure and a lower frequency of SAE were observed in policosanol patients compared with those taking placebo. The cholesterol-lowering efficacy of policosanol was that expected. These results provide support that policosanol therapy added to hypercholesterolemic elderly individuals taking beta-blockers could provide additional benefits in lowering blood pressure; SAE were not more frequent in the policosanol group than in the placebo group and there was no increase in AE.

老年患者同时使用胆甾醇和-受体阻滞剂。
胆甾醇是一种具有抗血小板作用的降胆固醇药物。它是安全且耐受性良好的,即使在伴随用药较多的人群中也是如此。这些数据表明,由于药物与药物相互作用(DDI)导致的不良事件(AE)与乙醇醇无关。实验数据表明,脂醇与通过肝细胞色素P450代谢的药物之间可能存在DDI,但不能排除药效学上的DDI。几项临床研究表明,与安慰剂相比,胆甾醇可降低动脉压,并且与β受体阻滞剂的药理相互作用已被实验证实。因此,可以预期在临床上胆甾醇和-受体阻滞剂之间的DDI。本研究调查了胆甾醇是否会增强β受体阻滞剂的降压作用和/或这种组合是否会损害某些安全性指标或诱发老年患者特异性AE。在仅限饮食的基线期5周后,205名服用β受体阻滞剂的老年高胆固醇血症患者被随机分为5毫克/天的胆甾醇组或安慰剂组,为期3年。治疗1年后,与安慰剂相比,胆甾醇显著降低(p < 0.00001)低密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(LDL-C)(20.9%)、总胆固醇(TC)(19.3%)和甘油三酯(TG)(25.7%),而与安慰剂相比,胆甾醇增加(p < 0.01和p < 0.001)高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(HDL-C)水平(4.1%)。在3年的随访中,治疗效果没有消失。研究结束时,与安慰剂相比,甘草甾醇降低(p < 0.00001) LDL-C(34.3%)、TC(23.2%)和TG(21.2%),升高(p < 0.00001) HDL-C(12.3%)。31名患者(15.1%)停止了研究,安慰剂组22名(20.6%),胆甾醇组9名(9.2%)。其中,20例患者(安慰剂组16例,乙醇组4例)因AE退出研究。胆甾醇组严重不良事件(SAE)发生率(3/98,3.1%)低于安慰剂组(15/107,14.0%)。未观察到安全指标受损。然而,与安慰剂组相比,糖醇组患者的收缩压和舒张压均有所降低。胆甾醇组报告轻度或中度AE的频率(18/98,18.4%)也低于安慰剂组(30/107,28.0%)。综上所述,服用β受体阻滞剂的老年患者对胆甾醇具有良好的耐受性,并且不会增加AE。与服用安慰剂的患者相比,多酚组患者血压进一步降低,SAE发生率降低。其降胆固醇效果与预期一致。这些结果支持,在服用β受体阻滞剂的高胆固醇血症老年人中添加胆固醇醇治疗可以在降低血压方面提供额外的益处;在乙醇组中,SAE并不比安慰剂组更频繁,AE也没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信