"It's the people that make the environment good or bad": the patient's experience of the acute care hospital environment.

Mona Shattell, Beverly Hogan, Sandra P Thomas
{"title":"\"It's the people that make the environment good or bad\": the patient's experience of the acute care hospital environment.","authors":"Mona Shattell,&nbsp;Beverly Hogan,&nbsp;Sandra P Thomas","doi":"10.1097/00044067-200504000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review of contemporary nursing research reveals a tendency to focus on select aspects of the hospital environment such as noise, light, and music. Although studies such as these shed light on discrete aspects of the hospital environment, this body of literature contributes little to an understanding of the entirety of that world as the patient in the sickbed experiences it. The purpose of the study detailed in this article was to describe the patient's experience of the acute care hospital environment. Nondirective, in-depth phenomenological interviews were conducted, then transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for themes. Against the backdrop of \"I lived and that's all that matters,\" there were 3 predominant themes in patients' experience of the acute care environment: (1) disconnection/connection, (2) fear/less fear, and (3) confinement/freedom. In this environment, human-to-human contact increased security and power in an environment that was described as sterile, disorienting, and untrustworthy. Acute and critical care nurses and other caregivers can use the findings to create less noxious hospital environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":79311,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues","volume":"16 2","pages":"159-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00044067-200504000-00006","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200504000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

A review of contemporary nursing research reveals a tendency to focus on select aspects of the hospital environment such as noise, light, and music. Although studies such as these shed light on discrete aspects of the hospital environment, this body of literature contributes little to an understanding of the entirety of that world as the patient in the sickbed experiences it. The purpose of the study detailed in this article was to describe the patient's experience of the acute care hospital environment. Nondirective, in-depth phenomenological interviews were conducted, then transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for themes. Against the backdrop of "I lived and that's all that matters," there were 3 predominant themes in patients' experience of the acute care environment: (1) disconnection/connection, (2) fear/less fear, and (3) confinement/freedom. In this environment, human-to-human contact increased security and power in an environment that was described as sterile, disorienting, and untrustworthy. Acute and critical care nurses and other caregivers can use the findings to create less noxious hospital environments.

“是人决定了环境的好坏”:病人对急症护理医院环境的体验。
对当代护理研究的回顾表明,人们倾向于关注医院环境的某些方面,如噪音、光线和音乐。尽管诸如此类的研究揭示了医院环境的离散方面,但这些文献对理解病人在病床上经历的整个世界贡献不大。本文详细研究的目的是描述患者对急症护理医院环境的体验。进行非指导性、深入的现象学访谈,然后逐字记录,并分析主题。在“我活着,这才是最重要的”的背景下,病人对急症护理环境的体验有三个主要主题:(1)断开/连接,(2)恐惧/减少恐惧,(3)禁闭/自由。在这种环境中,人与人之间的接触在一个被描述为贫瘠、迷失方向和不可信的环境中增加了安全和权力。急症和重症护理护士和其他护理人员可以利用这些发现来创造更少有害的医院环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信