Combined Utilisation of Rapid Assessment Procedures for Loiasis (RAPLOA) and Onchocerciasis (REA) in Rain forest Villages of Cameroon.

Samuel Wanji, Nicholas Tendongfor, Mathias Esum, Siker Sj Yundze, Mark J Taylor, Peter Enyong
{"title":"Combined Utilisation of Rapid Assessment Procedures for Loiasis (RAPLOA) and Onchocerciasis (REA) in Rain forest Villages of Cameroon.","authors":"Samuel Wanji,&nbsp;Nicholas Tendongfor,&nbsp;Mathias Esum,&nbsp;Siker Sj Yundze,&nbsp;Mark J Taylor,&nbsp;Peter Enyong","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-4-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Individuals with high microfilarial loads of Loa loa are at increased risk of neurologic serious adverse (SAE) events following ivermectin treatment against onchocerciasis. RAPLOA (Rapid Assessment Procedure for loiasis), a newly developed rapid assessment procedure for loiasis that relates the prevalence of key clinical manifestation of loiasis (history of eye worm) to the level of endemicity of the infection (prevalence of high intensity), is a very useful tool to identify areas at potential risk of L. loa post ivermectin treatment encephalopathy. In a perspective of treatment decision making in areas of co-endemicity of loiasis/onchocerciasis, it would be advantageous (both in time and cost savings) for national onchocerciasis control programmes to use RAPLOA and the Rapid epidemiologic assessment for onchocerciasis (REA), in combination in given surveys. Since each of the two rapid assessment tools have their own specificities, the workability of combining the two methods needed to be tested. METHODS: We worked in 10 communities of a forest area presumed co-endemic for loiasis and onchocerciasis in the North-West Province of Cameroon where the mass-treatment with ivermectin had not been carried out. A four-step approach was used and comprised: (i) generating data on the prevalence and intensity of loiasis and onchocerciasis in an area where such information is scarce; (ii) testing the relationship between the L. loa microfilaraemia prevalence and the RAPLOA prevalence, (iii) testing the relationship between the O. volvulus microfiladermia prevalence and the REA prevalence, (iv) testing the workability of combining RAPLOA/REA by study teams in which a single individual can perform the interview for RAPLOA and the nodule palpation for REA. RESULTS: The microfilaraemia prevalence of loiasis in communities ranged from 3.6% to 14.3%. 6 (0.61%) individuals had L. loa microfilarial loads above 8000 mf/ml but none of them attained 30,000 mf/ml, the threshold value above which the risk of developing neurologic SAE after ivermectin treatment is very high. None of the communities surveyed had RAPLOA prevalence above 40%. All the communities had microfiladermia prevalence above 60%. The microfiladermia results could be confirmed by the rapid epidemiologic method (nodule palpation), with all the 10 communities having REA prevalence above 20%. For the first time, this study has demonstrated that the two rapid assessment procedures for loiasis and onchocerciasis can be carried out simultaneously by a survey team, in which a single individual can administer the questionnaire for RAPLOA and perform the nodule palpation for REA. CONCLUSION: This study has: (i) Revealed that the Momo valley of the North West province of Cameroon is hyperendemic for onchocerciasis, but is of lower level of endemicity for L. loa. (ii) Confirmed the previous relationships established between RAPLOA and the L. loa microfilaraemia prevalence in one hand and between the REA and the O. volvulus microfiladermia prevalence in another hand (iii) Shown that RAPLOA and REA could be used simultaneously for the evaluation of loiasis and onchocerciasis endemicity in areas targeted by the African Programme for onchocerciasis Control for community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI).</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-4-2","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-4-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with high microfilarial loads of Loa loa are at increased risk of neurologic serious adverse (SAE) events following ivermectin treatment against onchocerciasis. RAPLOA (Rapid Assessment Procedure for loiasis), a newly developed rapid assessment procedure for loiasis that relates the prevalence of key clinical manifestation of loiasis (history of eye worm) to the level of endemicity of the infection (prevalence of high intensity), is a very useful tool to identify areas at potential risk of L. loa post ivermectin treatment encephalopathy. In a perspective of treatment decision making in areas of co-endemicity of loiasis/onchocerciasis, it would be advantageous (both in time and cost savings) for national onchocerciasis control programmes to use RAPLOA and the Rapid epidemiologic assessment for onchocerciasis (REA), in combination in given surveys. Since each of the two rapid assessment tools have their own specificities, the workability of combining the two methods needed to be tested. METHODS: We worked in 10 communities of a forest area presumed co-endemic for loiasis and onchocerciasis in the North-West Province of Cameroon where the mass-treatment with ivermectin had not been carried out. A four-step approach was used and comprised: (i) generating data on the prevalence and intensity of loiasis and onchocerciasis in an area where such information is scarce; (ii) testing the relationship between the L. loa microfilaraemia prevalence and the RAPLOA prevalence, (iii) testing the relationship between the O. volvulus microfiladermia prevalence and the REA prevalence, (iv) testing the workability of combining RAPLOA/REA by study teams in which a single individual can perform the interview for RAPLOA and the nodule palpation for REA. RESULTS: The microfilaraemia prevalence of loiasis in communities ranged from 3.6% to 14.3%. 6 (0.61%) individuals had L. loa microfilarial loads above 8000 mf/ml but none of them attained 30,000 mf/ml, the threshold value above which the risk of developing neurologic SAE after ivermectin treatment is very high. None of the communities surveyed had RAPLOA prevalence above 40%. All the communities had microfiladermia prevalence above 60%. The microfiladermia results could be confirmed by the rapid epidemiologic method (nodule palpation), with all the 10 communities having REA prevalence above 20%. For the first time, this study has demonstrated that the two rapid assessment procedures for loiasis and onchocerciasis can be carried out simultaneously by a survey team, in which a single individual can administer the questionnaire for RAPLOA and perform the nodule palpation for REA. CONCLUSION: This study has: (i) Revealed that the Momo valley of the North West province of Cameroon is hyperendemic for onchocerciasis, but is of lower level of endemicity for L. loa. (ii) Confirmed the previous relationships established between RAPLOA and the L. loa microfilaraemia prevalence in one hand and between the REA and the O. volvulus microfiladermia prevalence in another hand (iii) Shown that RAPLOA and REA could be used simultaneously for the evaluation of loiasis and onchocerciasis endemicity in areas targeted by the African Programme for onchocerciasis Control for community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在喀麦隆的热带雨林村庄联合使用loloasis (RAPLOA)和盘尾丝虫病(REA)快速评估程序。
背景:在伊维菌素治疗盘尾丝虫病后,Loa Loa微丝虫载量高的个体发生神经系统严重不良反应(SAE)事件的风险增加。rapova (loiasis快速评估程序)是一种新开发的loiasis快速评估程序,它将loiasis的主要临床表现(眼虫史)的患病率与感染的地方性水平(高强度患病率)联系起来,是一种非常有用的工具,用于识别伊维菌素治疗后loiva脑病的潜在风险区域。从loloasis /盘尾丝虫病共同流行地区的治疗决策角度来看,国家盘尾丝虫病控制规划在特定调查中结合使用RAPLOA和盘尾丝虫病快速流行病学评估(REA)将是有利的(在时间和成本上都是有利的)。由于这两种快速评估工具中的每一种都有自己的特殊性,因此需要测试结合这两种方法的可操作性。方法:我们在喀麦隆西北省一个森林地区的10个社区开展工作,该地区被认为是路易虫病和盘尾丝虫病共同流行,但尚未进行伊维菌素的大规模治疗。采用了一种四步骤方法,包括:(i)在缺乏这类资料的地区产生关于路易丝虫病和盘尾丝虫病流行率和强度的数据;(ii)测试L. loa微丝虫病流行率与RAPLOA流行率之间的关系;(iii)测试O. evorvulus微丝虫病流行率与REA流行率之间的关系;(iv)通过研究小组测试RAPLOA/REA结合的可行性,其中单个个体可以进行RAPLOA访谈和REA结节触诊。结果:社区丝虫病微丝虫病患病率为3.6% ~ 14.3%。6人(0.61%)的L. loa微丝虫负荷超过8000 mf/ml,但没有人达到30000 mf/ml,超过30000 mf/ml后伊维菌素治疗后发生神经系统SAE的风险很高。所有调查社区的RAPLOA患病率均未超过40%。各群落微丝虫病流行率均在60%以上。微丝虫病检测结果经快速流行病学法(结节触诊法)证实,10个社区REA患病率均在20%以上。本研究首次证明了一个调查小组可以同时进行盘尾丝虫病和盘尾丝虫病两种快速评估程序,其中一人可以进行RAPLOA问卷调查和REA结节触诊。结论:本研究发现:(1)喀麦隆西北省莫莫河谷盘尾丝虫病为高流行区,而盘尾丝虫病为低流行区。(ii)证实了先前建立的RAPLOA与L. loa微丝虫病流行之间的关系,以及REA与O. volvulus微丝虫病流行之间的关系。(iii)表明RAPLOA和REA可以同时用于评估非洲盘尾丝虫病控制规划所针对地区的loasis和盘尾丝虫病流行情况,以社区为导向使用伊维菌素(CDTI)进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信