"To protect or not to protect?" Complaining vulnerable adults? That is the challenge.

Louise Bell, Rachel Osborne, Peter Gregg
{"title":"\"To protect or not to protect?\" Complaining vulnerable adults? That is the challenge.","authors":"Louise Bell,&nbsp;Rachel Osborne,&nbsp;Peter Gregg","doi":"10.1108/09526860510612234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hidden camera television documentaries filmed in care home settings have shown evidence of the abuse of vulnerable adults, been widely discussed in the mass media and have brought the attention of the mass population to the importance of these issues. Governmental documents have also emphasised the need to protect vulnerable adults. It is therefore known that vulnerable adults exist and require protection from abuse in any shape or form. However, this paper aims to argue that protecting vulnerable adults and the current mechanisms for encouraging such individuals to make their views known to services are not mutually compatible. The main technique vulnerable adults may use, the complaints procedure, currently may not be sufficient to enable vulnerable adults to express themselves and their anxieties adequately.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The paper provides a case study which clearly demonstrates the nature of the problems, and then recognises and describes a number of levels which could be explored to learn more about these issues.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>Potential solutions are explored by the authors, who draw conclusions about the need for further research into this area.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This paper defines a gap between adult protection and complaints procedures, questioning both their efficacy and abilities to meet their stated aims. The paper also highlights that the nature of these may not sufficiently enable complaining vulnerable adults to express their views of services.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"18 4-5","pages":"385-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860510612234","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510612234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Hidden camera television documentaries filmed in care home settings have shown evidence of the abuse of vulnerable adults, been widely discussed in the mass media and have brought the attention of the mass population to the importance of these issues. Governmental documents have also emphasised the need to protect vulnerable adults. It is therefore known that vulnerable adults exist and require protection from abuse in any shape or form. However, this paper aims to argue that protecting vulnerable adults and the current mechanisms for encouraging such individuals to make their views known to services are not mutually compatible. The main technique vulnerable adults may use, the complaints procedure, currently may not be sufficient to enable vulnerable adults to express themselves and their anxieties adequately.

Design/methodology/approach: The paper provides a case study which clearly demonstrates the nature of the problems, and then recognises and describes a number of levels which could be explored to learn more about these issues.

Research limitations/implications: Potential solutions are explored by the authors, who draw conclusions about the need for further research into this area.

Originality/value: This paper defines a gap between adult protection and complaints procedures, questioning both their efficacy and abilities to meet their stated aims. The paper also highlights that the nature of these may not sufficiently enable complaining vulnerable adults to express their views of services.

“保护还是不保护?”抱怨脆弱的成年人?这就是挑战所在。
目的:在护养院环境中拍摄的隐蔽摄像机电视纪录片显示了虐待脆弱成年人的证据,在大众传播媒介中得到广泛讨论,并使大众注意到这些问题的重要性。政府文件也强调了保护弱势成年人的必要性。因此,我们知道,脆弱的成年人是存在的,他们需要保护,不受任何形式的虐待。然而,本文旨在论证保护弱势成年人和鼓励这些个人向服务机构表达意见的现行机制是不相容的。易受伤害的成年人可能使用的主要技术,即投诉程序,目前可能不足以使易受伤害的成年人充分表达自己和他们的焦虑。设计/方法论/方法:本文提供了一个案例研究,清楚地展示了问题的本质,然后识别和描述了一些可以探索的层次,以了解更多关于这些问题的信息。研究局限性/启示:作者探讨了潜在的解决方案,并得出了需要进一步研究这一领域的结论。原创性/价值:本文定义了成人保护和投诉程序之间的差距,质疑其效力和能力,以满足其既定目标。该论文还强调,这些性质可能不足以使抱怨脆弱的成年人表达他们对服务的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信