André-Michael Beer, Stefan Fey, Jens Ciborovius, Martin Knorr
{"title":"[Drug exanthema in connection with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment, triggered by leech therapy].","authors":"André-Michael Beer, Stefan Fey, Jens Ciborovius, Martin Knorr","doi":"10.1159/000083242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a 58-year-old hospitalized woman with gonarthrosis a leech therapy was applied to both knee joints. In the evening of the following day she observed strong pruritus in the area of the leech bites; in addition a maculopapular exanthema appeared on the torso and her lower extremities. The allergic reaction lasted four days. Administration of antihistamines only led to a slight improvement of the symptoms. A full restitution could only be achieved after a systemic dose of glucocorticoids on the fourth day after leech therapy. Eight days before beginning of the leech therapy a five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Cotrim forte) had been administered to treat an uncomplicated urinary infection. Allergic reactions are well-known complications of these antibiotics and of leech therapy. The four-day duration of the allergic reaction after leech therapy, however, was untypical. In order to explain these symptoms, a prick test and an epicutaneous test for the antibiotic components were executed five weeks after the leech therapy. Furthermore, a second leech therapy was administered and a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was carried out. The results of the LTT showed a sensitization for sulfamethoxazole and a possible sensitization for trimethoprim, the results of the epicutaneous test showed a positive reaction to sodium lauryl sulfate, a component of the antibiotic. In the area of the leech bites a clear local skin reaction was observed. These results suggest a drug exanthema, in all probability triggered by the leech therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"32-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000083242","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000083242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a 58-year-old hospitalized woman with gonarthrosis a leech therapy was applied to both knee joints. In the evening of the following day she observed strong pruritus in the area of the leech bites; in addition a maculopapular exanthema appeared on the torso and her lower extremities. The allergic reaction lasted four days. Administration of antihistamines only led to a slight improvement of the symptoms. A full restitution could only be achieved after a systemic dose of glucocorticoids on the fourth day after leech therapy. Eight days before beginning of the leech therapy a five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Cotrim forte) had been administered to treat an uncomplicated urinary infection. Allergic reactions are well-known complications of these antibiotics and of leech therapy. The four-day duration of the allergic reaction after leech therapy, however, was untypical. In order to explain these symptoms, a prick test and an epicutaneous test for the antibiotic components were executed five weeks after the leech therapy. Furthermore, a second leech therapy was administered and a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was carried out. The results of the LTT showed a sensitization for sulfamethoxazole and a possible sensitization for trimethoprim, the results of the epicutaneous test showed a positive reaction to sodium lauryl sulfate, a component of the antibiotic. In the area of the leech bites a clear local skin reaction was observed. These results suggest a drug exanthema, in all probability triggered by the leech therapy.