[Drug exanthema in connection with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment, triggered by leech therapy].

André-Michael Beer, Stefan Fey, Jens Ciborovius, Martin Knorr
{"title":"[Drug exanthema in connection with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment, triggered by leech therapy].","authors":"André-Michael Beer,&nbsp;Stefan Fey,&nbsp;Jens Ciborovius,&nbsp;Martin Knorr","doi":"10.1159/000083242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a 58-year-old hospitalized woman with gonarthrosis a leech therapy was applied to both knee joints. In the evening of the following day she observed strong pruritus in the area of the leech bites; in addition a maculopapular exanthema appeared on the torso and her lower extremities. The allergic reaction lasted four days. Administration of antihistamines only led to a slight improvement of the symptoms. A full restitution could only be achieved after a systemic dose of glucocorticoids on the fourth day after leech therapy. Eight days before beginning of the leech therapy a five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Cotrim forte) had been administered to treat an uncomplicated urinary infection. Allergic reactions are well-known complications of these antibiotics and of leech therapy. The four-day duration of the allergic reaction after leech therapy, however, was untypical. In order to explain these symptoms, a prick test and an epicutaneous test for the antibiotic components were executed five weeks after the leech therapy. Furthermore, a second leech therapy was administered and a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was carried out. The results of the LTT showed a sensitization for sulfamethoxazole and a possible sensitization for trimethoprim, the results of the epicutaneous test showed a positive reaction to sodium lauryl sulfate, a component of the antibiotic. In the area of the leech bites a clear local skin reaction was observed. These results suggest a drug exanthema, in all probability triggered by the leech therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"32-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000083242","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000083242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a 58-year-old hospitalized woman with gonarthrosis a leech therapy was applied to both knee joints. In the evening of the following day she observed strong pruritus in the area of the leech bites; in addition a maculopapular exanthema appeared on the torso and her lower extremities. The allergic reaction lasted four days. Administration of antihistamines only led to a slight improvement of the symptoms. A full restitution could only be achieved after a systemic dose of glucocorticoids on the fourth day after leech therapy. Eight days before beginning of the leech therapy a five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Cotrim forte) had been administered to treat an uncomplicated urinary infection. Allergic reactions are well-known complications of these antibiotics and of leech therapy. The four-day duration of the allergic reaction after leech therapy, however, was untypical. In order to explain these symptoms, a prick test and an epicutaneous test for the antibiotic components were executed five weeks after the leech therapy. Furthermore, a second leech therapy was administered and a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was carried out. The results of the LTT showed a sensitization for sulfamethoxazole and a possible sensitization for trimethoprim, the results of the epicutaneous test showed a positive reaction to sodium lauryl sulfate, a component of the antibiotic. In the area of the leech bites a clear local skin reaction was observed. These results suggest a drug exanthema, in all probability triggered by the leech therapy.

[与甲氧苄啶和磺胺甲恶唑治疗有关的药物检查,由水蛭疗法引发]。
在58岁住院妇女膝关节病水蛭治疗应用于两个膝关节。第二天晚上,她观察到水蛭咬伤的地方有强烈的瘙痒;此外,躯干和下肢出现黄斑丘疹。过敏反应持续了四天。服用抗组胺药只能轻微改善症状。在水蛭治疗后的第四天,全身剂量的糖皮质激素才能完全恢复。在水蛭治疗开始前8天,使用甲氧苄啶和磺胺甲恶唑(康美特)进行为期5天的抗生素治疗,以治疗无并发症的泌尿系统感染。众所周知,过敏反应是这些抗生素和水蛭疗法的并发症。然而,水蛭治疗后持续四天的过敏反应是不典型的。为了解释这些症状,在水蛭治疗五周后进行了抗生素成分的点刺试验和表皮试验。此外,进行第二次水蛭治疗,并进行淋巴细胞转化试验(LTT)。LTT的结果显示对磺胺甲恶唑和甲氧苄啶可能致敏,表皮试验的结果显示对十二烷基硫酸钠(抗生素的一种成分)有阳性反应。在水蛭叮咬的区域,观察到明显的局部皮肤反应。这些结果表明药疹很可能是由水蛭疗法引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信