[How to advance in treating pain with opioids: less myths--less pain].

Ceskoslovenska fysiologie Pub Date : 2004-01-01
M Krsiak
{"title":"[How to advance in treating pain with opioids: less myths--less pain].","authors":"M Krsiak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much progress has taken place in knowledge of actions and use of opioids in pain in the last quarter century. There would be much less unnecessary pain and suffering if this knowledge would be applied properly in clinical practice. Why is it not? The major reasons appear to be ignorance, false prejudices (myths) and exaggerated limitations in availability of opioids for medical treatment of pain. Even the strongest opioid analgesics do not need to relieve pain in everybody. Their effect should be monitored and if inadequate, proper measures should be taken (e.g. adjusting a dose or changing an opioid). Weak opioids (codeine, tramadol) alone are mostly not stronger then non-opioid analgesics. However, combinations of opioid analgesics with paracetamol often show synergistic analgesic effect (without increased toxicity). Opioids actually represent very safe analgesics. Exaggerated opiophobia is a major myth causing much unnecessary pain and suffering in patients. Undue fear of drug abuse and/or political considerations have resulted in laws and regulations, that make it unnecessarily difficult to obtain opioids for medical use. An example of this might be a recent re-scheduling of buprenorphine in the Czech Republic and Slovakia among drugs with a very high abuse potential (e.g. morphine, fentanyl, amphetamine).</p>","PeriodicalId":75688,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska fysiologie","volume":"53 1","pages":"34-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska fysiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much progress has taken place in knowledge of actions and use of opioids in pain in the last quarter century. There would be much less unnecessary pain and suffering if this knowledge would be applied properly in clinical practice. Why is it not? The major reasons appear to be ignorance, false prejudices (myths) and exaggerated limitations in availability of opioids for medical treatment of pain. Even the strongest opioid analgesics do not need to relieve pain in everybody. Their effect should be monitored and if inadequate, proper measures should be taken (e.g. adjusting a dose or changing an opioid). Weak opioids (codeine, tramadol) alone are mostly not stronger then non-opioid analgesics. However, combinations of opioid analgesics with paracetamol often show synergistic analgesic effect (without increased toxicity). Opioids actually represent very safe analgesics. Exaggerated opiophobia is a major myth causing much unnecessary pain and suffering in patients. Undue fear of drug abuse and/or political considerations have resulted in laws and regulations, that make it unnecessarily difficult to obtain opioids for medical use. An example of this might be a recent re-scheduling of buprenorphine in the Czech Republic and Slovakia among drugs with a very high abuse potential (e.g. morphine, fentanyl, amphetamine).

[如何用阿片类药物治疗疼痛:减少神话-减少疼痛]。
在过去的四分之一世纪里,关于阿片类药物在疼痛方面的行动和使用的知识取得了很大进展。如果这些知识在临床实践中得到正确应用,就会减少很多不必要的痛苦和折磨。为什么不是呢?主要原因似乎是无知、错误的偏见(神话)和夸大了用于治疗疼痛的阿片类药物供应的限制。即使是最强的阿片类镇痛药也不需要缓解所有人的疼痛。应监测其效果,如果效果不充分,应采取适当措施(例如调整剂量或更换阿片类药物)。单用弱阿片类药物(可待因、曲马多)的镇痛效果大多不如非阿片类药物强。然而,阿片类镇痛药与扑热息痛联合使用通常表现出协同镇痛作用(不增加毒性)。阿片类药物实际上是非常安全的止痛药。夸大的阿片类药物恐惧症是一个主要的神话,给患者带来了许多不必要的痛苦和痛苦。对药物滥用的过度恐惧和(或)政治考虑导致了法律和法规的制定,使得获得用于医疗用途的类阿片变得不必要地困难。这方面的一个例子可能是,捷克共和国和斯洛伐克最近将丁丙诺啡重新列入极有可能被滥用的药物(如吗啡、芬太尼、安非他明)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信