Comparison of Microcapillary Cytometry Technology and Flow Cytometry for CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Estimation.

A J Kandathil, R Kannangai, S David, G Nithyanandam, S Solomon, P Balakrishnan, O C Abraham, S Subramanian, P Rupali, V P Verghese, S Pulimood, G Sridharan
{"title":"Comparison of Microcapillary Cytometry Technology and Flow Cytometry for CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Estimation.","authors":"A J Kandathil,&nbsp;R Kannangai,&nbsp;S David,&nbsp;G Nithyanandam,&nbsp;S Solomon,&nbsp;P Balakrishnan,&nbsp;O C Abraham,&nbsp;S Subramanian,&nbsp;P Rupali,&nbsp;V P Verghese,&nbsp;S Pulimood,&nbsp;G Sridharan","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An alternative technology for the estimation of T cells based on a microcapillary technique (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) was compared to FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Samples from 51 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 21 healthy individuals were tested. The correlation (r) of the two systems for CD4(+) T cells was 0.994, and the coefficient of variation was 6.5%, establishing equable performance between the two technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 8","pages":"1006-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

An alternative technology for the estimation of T cells based on a microcapillary technique (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) was compared to FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Samples from 51 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 21 healthy individuals were tested. The correlation (r) of the two systems for CD4(+) T cells was 0.994, and the coefficient of variation was 6.5%, establishing equable performance between the two technologies.

微毛细管细胞术与流式细胞术检测CD4+和CD8+ t细胞的比较。
将一种基于微毛细管技术的T细胞估计替代技术(Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA)与FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA)进行比较。对51例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者和21例健康人的样本进行了检测。两种技术检测CD4(+) T细胞的相关系数(r)为0.994,变异系数为6.5%,两种技术表现均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信