Small group health insurance: ranking the states on the depth of reform, 1999.

Sudha Xirasagar, Michael E Samuels, Carleen H Stoskopf, William R Shrader, James R Hussey, Ruth P Saunders, Danielle T Smith
{"title":"Small group health insurance: ranking the states on the depth of reform, 1999.","authors":"Sudha Xirasagar,&nbsp;Michael E Samuels,&nbsp;Carleen H Stoskopf,&nbsp;William R Shrader,&nbsp;James R Hussey,&nbsp;Ruth P Saunders,&nbsp;Danielle T Smith","doi":"10.1300/J045v19n01_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>States are ranked based on the potential of their small group health insurance reforms to enhance health insurance uptake. Reforms were quantified based on their market impact potential. Five dimensions of reforms were identified, Access Improvement, Premium Reduction, Premium Differential Reduction, Continuity of Coverage, and Enhancing Valued Plan Features. The reform indices representing these dimensions were developed based on document review of state statutes, combined with actuarial judgment to identify and assign scores to market-relevant regulations in line with their impact potential. The distribution of the states' reform scores and rankings show wide variation in the depth and focus of their reforms. Only seven of the top ten states on the Total Reform index had consistently higher scores on two or more reform dimensions. The conceptual linkages between specific regulations and the documented small group market problems lead to normative expectations of an association between the depth of state reforms and the prevalence of uninsurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v19n01_01","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v19n01_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

States are ranked based on the potential of their small group health insurance reforms to enhance health insurance uptake. Reforms were quantified based on their market impact potential. Five dimensions of reforms were identified, Access Improvement, Premium Reduction, Premium Differential Reduction, Continuity of Coverage, and Enhancing Valued Plan Features. The reform indices representing these dimensions were developed based on document review of state statutes, combined with actuarial judgment to identify and assign scores to market-relevant regulations in line with their impact potential. The distribution of the states' reform scores and rankings show wide variation in the depth and focus of their reforms. Only seven of the top ten states on the Total Reform index had consistently higher scores on two or more reform dimensions. The conceptual linkages between specific regulations and the documented small group market problems lead to normative expectations of an association between the depth of state reforms and the prevalence of uninsurance.

小型团体医疗保险:各州改革深度排名,1999年。
各州的排名是根据其小型团体医疗保险改革在提高医疗保险使用率方面的潜力进行的。根据改革的市场影响潜力对改革进行了量化。确定了改革的五个方面:改善准入、减少保费、减少保费差异、覆盖范围的连续性和增强有价值的计划特征。代表这些维度的改革指数是基于对国家法规的文件审查,结合精算判断,根据市场相关法规的影响潜力确定和分配分数而制定的。各州改革得分和排名的分布表明,各州改革的深度和重点存在很大差异。在总改革指数排名前十的州中,只有七个州在两个或两个以上的改革维度上得分一直较高。具体规定与记录的小团体市场问题之间的概念联系导致对国家改革的深度与无保险的普遍之间存在关联的规范性期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信