Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.

Christian Hoser, Katja Tecklenburg, Karl Heinz Kuenzel, Christian Fink
{"title":"Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.","authors":"Christian Hoser,&nbsp;Katja Tecklenburg,&nbsp;Karl Heinz Kuenzel,&nbsp;Christian Fink","doi":"10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p>0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":"256-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2005/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p>0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.

ACL重建中股骨隧道位置的术后评价:x线平片与计算机断层扫描。
股骨隧道放置不准确已被确定为前交叉韧带重建失败中最常见的错误之一。大多数外科医生在x线平片上评估股骨隧道的位置,但在许多情况下,很难发现股骨隧道。本研究的目的是比较数字平片和多平面计算机断层扫描(CT)对股骨隧道位置的评估。我们检查了50例患者术后24-60个月,在关节镜辅助下前交叉韧带重建与中央第三骨-髌骨肌腱-骨移植。股骨侧采用内扣固定,胫骨侧采用钛干涉螺钉。对每位患者进行标准的前后位和侧位x光片和CT扫描。CT扫描的矢状面和额面重建用于评估。我们测量了前方切口处隧道中心的高度,以及侧面沿Blumensaat线(BL)的隧道位置。测量结果为总缺口高度和BL长度的百分比。在x光平片上,46例在前后平面上看不到隧道,8例在外侧平面上看不到隧道。平均位于正平面的占89.8%,位于侧平面的占38.6%。在CT扫描中,对48名患者进行了测量。锋面位置平均为90.5%,侧面位置平均为34.1%。CT与x线侧位值的Pearson相关系数较低,为0.22,p>0.05。在我们的50名患者中,只有4名患者能够在标准x光片的两个平面上检测到股骨隧道,而在48名患者中,通过重建CT扫描可以获得准确的测量结果。我们提倡在需要精确测量时使用CT技术来评估股骨位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信