Deciding on gender in children with intersex conditions: considerations and controversies.

Ute Thyen, Hertha Richter-Appelt, Claudia Wiesemann, Paul-Martin Holterhus, Olaf Hiort
{"title":"Deciding on gender in children with intersex conditions: considerations and controversies.","authors":"Ute Thyen,&nbsp;Hertha Richter-Appelt,&nbsp;Claudia Wiesemann,&nbsp;Paul-Martin Holterhus,&nbsp;Olaf Hiort","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic factors such as genetic and hormonal influences contribute to gender identity, gender role behavior, and sexual orientation in humans, but this relationship is considerably modified by psychologic, social, and cultural factors. The recognition of biologically determined conditions leading to incongruity of genetically determined sex, somatic phenotype, and gender identity has led to growing interest in gender role development and gender identity in individuals with intersex conditions. Sex assignment of children with ambiguous genitalia remains a difficult decision for the families involved and subject to controversial discussion among professionals and self-help groups. Although systematic empirical data on outcomes of functioning and health-related quality of life are sparse, anecdotal evidence from case series and individual patients about their experiences in healthcare suggests traumatic experiences in some. This article reviews the earlier 'optimal gender policy' as well as the more recent 'full consent policy' and reviews published data on both surgical and psychosocial outcomes. The professional debate on deciding on sex assignment in children with intersex conditions is embedded in a much wider public discourse on gender as a social construction. Given that the empirical basis of our knowledge of the causes, treatment options, long-term outcomes, and patient preferences is insufficient, we suggest preliminary recommendations based on clinical experience, study of the literature, and interviews with affected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Biologic factors such as genetic and hormonal influences contribute to gender identity, gender role behavior, and sexual orientation in humans, but this relationship is considerably modified by psychologic, social, and cultural factors. The recognition of biologically determined conditions leading to incongruity of genetically determined sex, somatic phenotype, and gender identity has led to growing interest in gender role development and gender identity in individuals with intersex conditions. Sex assignment of children with ambiguous genitalia remains a difficult decision for the families involved and subject to controversial discussion among professionals and self-help groups. Although systematic empirical data on outcomes of functioning and health-related quality of life are sparse, anecdotal evidence from case series and individual patients about their experiences in healthcare suggests traumatic experiences in some. This article reviews the earlier 'optimal gender policy' as well as the more recent 'full consent policy' and reviews published data on both surgical and psychosocial outcomes. The professional debate on deciding on sex assignment in children with intersex conditions is embedded in a much wider public discourse on gender as a social construction. Given that the empirical basis of our knowledge of the causes, treatment options, long-term outcomes, and patient preferences is insufficient, we suggest preliminary recommendations based on clinical experience, study of the literature, and interviews with affected individuals.

决定双性儿童的性别:考虑和争议。
生物因素,如遗传和激素的影响,有助于人类的性别认同、性别角色行为和性取向,但这种关系在很大程度上受到心理、社会和文化因素的影响。由于认识到生理上决定的条件会导致基因决定的性别、躯体表型和性别认同的不一致,人们对双性人性别角色发展和性别认同的兴趣日益浓厚。对于相关家庭来说,为生殖器不明确的儿童进行性别分配仍然是一个艰难的决定,并且受到专业人士和自助团体之间有争议的讨论。虽然关于功能和健康相关生活质量结果的系统经验数据很少,但来自病例系列和个体患者关于其医疗保健经历的轶事证据表明,一些患者有创伤经历。本文回顾了早期的“最优性别政策”以及最近的“完全同意政策”,并回顾了关于手术和心理社会结果的公开数据。关于决定双性儿童的性别分配问题的专业辩论,已经深入到将性别作为一种社会建构的更广泛的公共讨论中。鉴于我们对病因、治疗方案、长期结果和患者偏好的经验基础知识不足,我们根据临床经验、文献研究和对受影响个体的访谈提出初步建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信