[Statistical notes. Randomized controlled clinical trials of both superiority and non-inferiority: critical considerations].

Ettore Marubini, Paola Rebora, Giuseppe Reina
{"title":"[Statistical notes. Randomized controlled clinical trials of both superiority and non-inferiority: critical considerations].","authors":"Ettore Marubini,&nbsp;Paola Rebora,&nbsp;Giuseppe Reina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this statistical note, the fourth in the series, is to describe and critically appraise the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT) GUSTO V, which combined in a single RCCT both the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses. In this note we present the logical path that the authors have presumably followed in planning a RCCT of such a kind. The results are reported and possible critical aspects are highlighted and debated upon. Finally the cardiologist reader is stimulated to give his own opinion on this kind of approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":80290,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 6","pages":"361-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this statistical note, the fourth in the series, is to describe and critically appraise the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT) GUSTO V, which combined in a single RCCT both the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses. In this note we present the logical path that the authors have presumably followed in planning a RCCT of such a kind. The results are reported and possible critical aspects are highlighted and debated upon. Finally the cardiologist reader is stimulated to give his own opinion on this kind of approach.

(统计记录。优势和非劣效性的随机对照临床试验:关键考虑因素]。
本统计笔记的目的是描述和批判性评价随机对照临床试验GUSTO V (RCCT),该试验在单个RCCT中结合了优势和非劣效假设。在本文中,我们提出了作者在规划此类RCCT时可能遵循的逻辑路径。报告了结果,并强调和讨论了可能的关键方面。最后,鼓励心脏病专家读者对这种方法提出自己的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信