Burden of burn: a norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function.

James A Fauerbach, Dennis Lezotte, Rebecca A Hills, G Fred Cromes, Karen Kowalske, Barbara J de Lateur, Cleon W Goodwin, Patricia Blakeney, David N Herndon, Shelley A Wiechman, Loren H Engrav, David R Patterson
{"title":"Burden of burn: a norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function.","authors":"James A Fauerbach,&nbsp;Dennis Lezotte,&nbsp;Rebecca A Hills,&nbsp;G Fred Cromes,&nbsp;Karen Kowalske,&nbsp;Barbara J de Lateur,&nbsp;Cleon W Goodwin,&nbsp;Patricia Blakeney,&nbsp;David N Herndon,&nbsp;Shelley A Wiechman,&nbsp;Loren H Engrav,&nbsp;David R Patterson","doi":"10.1097/01.bcr.0000150216.87940.ac","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were defined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or > or = 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"26 1","pages":"21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.bcr.0000150216.87940.ac","citationCount":"111","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000150216.87940.ac","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111

Abstract

This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were defined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or > or = 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.

烧伤负担:一项基于规范的调查烧伤大小和痛苦对身体和心理功能恢复的影响。
这项前瞻性、纵向研究考察了基线生理和心理负担对来自三个地区烧伤中心的严重烧伤成人健康相关生活质量系列评估的影响(n = 162)。身体负荷组按TBSA烧伤百分比:30%定义。心理负担组采用简短症状量表整体严重程度指数t评分(< 63或>或= 63)来定义院内窘迫。分析比较了不同负担水平的组和已公布的规范数据。评估反映了烧伤前一个月、出院时以及烧伤后6个月和12个月的健康和功能(简表36)。无论是生理负担过重还是心理负担过重的人,其生理功能受损程度和恢复速度都明显更慢。值得注意的是,那些心理负担更重的人,心理社会功能受损更严重,心理社会恢复速度也更慢。这些结果表明,除了积极缝合伤口外,减少住院痛苦的干预措施可能会加速身体和心理康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信