Bronchoalveolar lavage in diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with burns.

Wendy L Wahl, Karla S Ahrns, Mary-Margaret Brandt, Stephen A Rowe, Mark R Hemmila, Saman Arbabi
{"title":"Bronchoalveolar lavage in diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with burns.","authors":"Wendy L Wahl,&nbsp;Karla S Ahrns,&nbsp;Mary-Margaret Brandt,&nbsp;Stephen A Rowe,&nbsp;Mark R Hemmila,&nbsp;Saman Arbabi","doi":"10.1097/01.bcr.0000150305.25484.1a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with burns. In nonburn populations, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) excludes other pathology such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesized that BAL would decrease our false-positive VAP rate. All ventilated patients with burn injury who were admitted to our institution from July 2000 through June 2003 were included. After June 2001, BAL was used to make the diagnosis of VAP, with > or =10(4) organisms considered a positive result. Fifty patients met criteria for VAP, 21 in the pre-BAL period and 29 in the BAL period. Six patients (21%) in the BAL group had quantitative cultures <10(4) and were not treated. The outcomes for these patients were not different than those treated for VAP. There were no differences in age, TBSA size, antibiotic use, or ventilator days for the pre-BAL or BAL groups, although the pneumonia rate was lower for the BAL time period. The use of BAL eliminated the unnecessary antibiotic treatment of 21% of patients in the BAL time period and was associated with a lower rate of VAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"26 1","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.bcr.0000150305.25484.1a","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000150305.25484.1a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with burns. In nonburn populations, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) excludes other pathology such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesized that BAL would decrease our false-positive VAP rate. All ventilated patients with burn injury who were admitted to our institution from July 2000 through June 2003 were included. After June 2001, BAL was used to make the diagnosis of VAP, with > or =10(4) organisms considered a positive result. Fifty patients met criteria for VAP, 21 in the pre-BAL period and 29 in the BAL period. Six patients (21%) in the BAL group had quantitative cultures <10(4) and were not treated. The outcomes for these patients were not different than those treated for VAP. There were no differences in age, TBSA size, antibiotic use, or ventilator days for the pre-BAL or BAL groups, although the pneumonia rate was lower for the BAL time period. The use of BAL eliminated the unnecessary antibiotic treatment of 21% of patients in the BAL time period and was associated with a lower rate of VAP.

支气管肺泡灌洗对烧伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的诊断价值。
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)仍然是烧伤患者发病和死亡的主要原因。在非烧伤人群中,支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)排除了其他病理,如全身炎症反应综合征。我们假设BAL会降低我们的假阳性VAP率。本研究纳入了2000年7月至2003年6月在我院住院的所有烧伤患者。2001年6月以后,使用BAL诊断VAP,大于或=10(4)个生物体被认为是阳性结果。50例患者符合VAP标准,21例在BAL前期,29例在BAL期。BAL组有6例(21%)患者进行了定量培养
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信