Actin and alpha-actinin dynamics in the adhesion and motility of EPEC and EHEC on host cells.

Nathan C Shaner, Joseph W Sanger, Jean M Sanger
{"title":"Actin and alpha-actinin dynamics in the adhesion and motility of EPEC and EHEC on host cells.","authors":"Nathan C Shaner,&nbsp;Joseph W Sanger,&nbsp;Jean M Sanger","doi":"10.1002/cm.20047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two pathogenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), adhere to the outside of host cells and induce cytoskeletal rearrangements leading to the formation of membrane-encased pedestals comprised of actin filaments and other associated proteins beneath the bacteria. The structure of the pedestals induced by the two pathogens appears similar, although those induced by EHEC are shorter in length. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) was used to determine potential differences of actin polymerization in EPEC and EHEC induced pedestals in cultured PtK2 cells expressing either Green or Yellow Fluorescent Protein (GFP or YFP) fused to actin or alpha-actinin. When all the fluorescent actin in a pedestal on EPEC-infected cells was photobleached, fluorescence recovery first occurred directly beneath the bacterium in a band that grew wider at a rate of one micron/minute. Consistently observed in all EPEC-induced pedestals, whether they were stationary, lengthening, or translocating, the rate of actin polymerization that occurred at the pedestal tip was approximately 1 mum/min. Overall, a much slower rate of actin polymerization was measured in long EHEC-induced pedestals. In contrast to the dynamics of GFP-actin, recovery of GFP-alpha-actinin fluorescence was not polarized, with the actin cross-linking protein exchanging all the length of the EPEC/EHEC induced pedestals. Surprisingly, the depolymerization and retrograde flow of pedestal actin, as well as pedestal translocations, were inhibited reversibly by either 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) or by a combination of sodium azide and 2-deoxy D-glucose, leading to an increase in the lengths of the pedestals. A simple physical model was developed to describe elongation and translocation of EPEC/EHEC pedestals in terms of actin polymerization and depolymerization dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9675,"journal":{"name":"Cell motility and the cytoskeleton","volume":"60 2","pages":"104-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cm.20047","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell motility and the cytoskeleton","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Two pathogenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), adhere to the outside of host cells and induce cytoskeletal rearrangements leading to the formation of membrane-encased pedestals comprised of actin filaments and other associated proteins beneath the bacteria. The structure of the pedestals induced by the two pathogens appears similar, although those induced by EHEC are shorter in length. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) was used to determine potential differences of actin polymerization in EPEC and EHEC induced pedestals in cultured PtK2 cells expressing either Green or Yellow Fluorescent Protein (GFP or YFP) fused to actin or alpha-actinin. When all the fluorescent actin in a pedestal on EPEC-infected cells was photobleached, fluorescence recovery first occurred directly beneath the bacterium in a band that grew wider at a rate of one micron/minute. Consistently observed in all EPEC-induced pedestals, whether they were stationary, lengthening, or translocating, the rate of actin polymerization that occurred at the pedestal tip was approximately 1 mum/min. Overall, a much slower rate of actin polymerization was measured in long EHEC-induced pedestals. In contrast to the dynamics of GFP-actin, recovery of GFP-alpha-actinin fluorescence was not polarized, with the actin cross-linking protein exchanging all the length of the EPEC/EHEC induced pedestals. Surprisingly, the depolymerization and retrograde flow of pedestal actin, as well as pedestal translocations, were inhibited reversibly by either 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) or by a combination of sodium azide and 2-deoxy D-glucose, leading to an increase in the lengths of the pedestals. A simple physical model was developed to describe elongation and translocation of EPEC/EHEC pedestals in terms of actin polymerization and depolymerization dynamics.

肌动蛋白和α -肌动蛋白在EPEC和EHEC对宿主细胞的粘附和运动中的动力学。
两种致病性大肠杆菌,肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)和肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC),粘附在宿主细胞外部并诱导细胞骨架重排,导致形成由肌动蛋白细丝和细菌下方其他相关蛋白质组成的膜包裹基座。虽然肠出血性大肠杆菌诱导的底座长度较短,但两种病原体诱导的底座结构相似。荧光漂白后恢复(FRAP)用于测定培养的PtK2细胞中肌动蛋白聚合在EPEC和EHEC诱导的基底中的潜在差异,这些细胞分别表达绿色或黄色荧光蛋白(GFP或YFP)与肌动蛋白或α -肌动蛋白融合。当epec感染细胞上的所有荧光肌动蛋白都被光漂白时,荧光恢复首先发生在细菌正下方,以1微米/分钟的速度变宽。在所有epec诱导的支架中,无论它们是固定的、延长的还是易位的,肌动蛋白聚合发生在支架尖端的速率大约是1妈妈/分钟。总的来说,在长ehec诱导的基座上测量到的肌动蛋白聚合速率要慢得多。与gfp -肌动蛋白的动态相反,gfp - α -肌动蛋白的荧光恢复没有极化,肌动蛋白交联蛋白交换了EPEC/EHEC诱导基座的所有长度。令人惊讶的是,基座肌动蛋白的解聚和逆行流动以及基座易位被2,3-丁二酮单肟(BDM)或叠氮化钠和2-脱氧d -葡萄糖的组合可逆地抑制,导致基座长度增加。建立了一个简单的物理模型来描述肌动蛋白聚合和解聚动力学方面EPEC/EHEC基座的延伸和易位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信