An economic analysis of health plan conversions: are they in the public interest?

Nancy Dean Beaulieu
{"title":"An economic analysis of health plan conversions: are they in the public interest?","authors":"Nancy Dean Beaulieu","doi":"10.2202/1558-9544.1054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, managed-care companies have been consolidating on both a regional and national scale. More recently, nonprofit health plans have been converting to for-profit status, and this conversion has frequently occurred as a step to facilitate merger or acquisition with a for-profit company. Some industry observers attribute these managed-care marketplace trends to an industry shakeout resulting from increased competition in the sector. At the same time, these perceived competitive pressures have led to questions about the long-run viability of nonprofit health plans. Furthermore, some industry and government leaders believe that some nonprofits are already conducting themselves like for-profit health plans and question the state premium tax exemption ordinarily accorded to such plans. This paper examines related health policy issues through the lens of a case study of the proposed conversion of the CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield company to a for-profit public-stock company and its merger with the Wellpoint Corporation. Company executives and board members argued that CareFirst lacked access to sufficient capital and faced serious threats to its viability as a financially healthy nonprofit health care company. They also argued that CareFirst and its beneficiaries would benefit from merger through enhanced economies of scale and product-line extensions. Critics of the proposed conversion and merger raised concerns about the adverse impacts on access to care, coverage availability, quality of care, safety-net providers, and the cost of health insurance. Analyses demonstrate that CareFirst wields substantial market power in its local market, that it is unlikely to realize cost savings through expanded economies of scale, and that access to capital concerns are largely driven by the perceived need for further expansion through merger and acquisition. Although it is impossible to predict future changes in quality of care for CareFirst, analyses suggest that quality appears to be somewhat lower in for-profit national managed-care companies. Additional research is needed to assess the viability of true nonprofits, the potential effects of nonprofits and for-profit national managed-care plans on the evolution of local insurance and provider markets, and methods for effective oversight of nonprofit health plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":87181,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health policy research","volume":"7 ","pages":"129-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1558-9544.1054","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health policy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-9544.1054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Over the last decade, managed-care companies have been consolidating on both a regional and national scale. More recently, nonprofit health plans have been converting to for-profit status, and this conversion has frequently occurred as a step to facilitate merger or acquisition with a for-profit company. Some industry observers attribute these managed-care marketplace trends to an industry shakeout resulting from increased competition in the sector. At the same time, these perceived competitive pressures have led to questions about the long-run viability of nonprofit health plans. Furthermore, some industry and government leaders believe that some nonprofits are already conducting themselves like for-profit health plans and question the state premium tax exemption ordinarily accorded to such plans. This paper examines related health policy issues through the lens of a case study of the proposed conversion of the CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield company to a for-profit public-stock company and its merger with the Wellpoint Corporation. Company executives and board members argued that CareFirst lacked access to sufficient capital and faced serious threats to its viability as a financially healthy nonprofit health care company. They also argued that CareFirst and its beneficiaries would benefit from merger through enhanced economies of scale and product-line extensions. Critics of the proposed conversion and merger raised concerns about the adverse impacts on access to care, coverage availability, quality of care, safety-net providers, and the cost of health insurance. Analyses demonstrate that CareFirst wields substantial market power in its local market, that it is unlikely to realize cost savings through expanded economies of scale, and that access to capital concerns are largely driven by the perceived need for further expansion through merger and acquisition. Although it is impossible to predict future changes in quality of care for CareFirst, analyses suggest that quality appears to be somewhat lower in for-profit national managed-care companies. Additional research is needed to assess the viability of true nonprofits, the potential effects of nonprofits and for-profit national managed-care plans on the evolution of local insurance and provider markets, and methods for effective oversight of nonprofit health plans.

健康计划转换的经济分析:它们符合公众利益吗?
在过去的十年里,管理式医疗公司在地区和全国范围内进行了整合。最近,非营利性的健康计划已经转变为营利性的状态,这种转变经常发生,作为促进与营利性公司合并或收购的一步。一些行业观察人士将这些管理式医疗市场趋势归因于行业竞争加剧导致的行业洗牌。与此同时,这些感知到的竞争压力导致了对非营利性健康计划长期可行性的质疑。此外,一些行业和政府领导人认为,一些非营利组织已经在像营利性医疗计划那样经营自己,并对通常给予此类计划的国家保费免税提出质疑。本文通过一个案例研究的视角,考察了相关的卫生政策问题,该案例研究建议将CareFirst蓝十字蓝盾公司转变为一家营利性的上市公司,并与Wellpoint公司合并。公司高管和董事会成员认为,CareFirst缺乏足够的资金,作为一家财务健康的非营利性医疗保健公司,其生存能力面临严重威胁。他们还认为,CareFirst及其受益者将通过规模经济的增强和产品线的扩展从合并中受益。对拟议的转换和合并的批评者提出了对获得保健、覆盖面、保健质量、安全网提供者和健康保险费用的不利影响的关切。分析表明,CareFirst在其当地市场拥有巨大的市场力量,它不太可能通过扩大规模经济来实现成本节约,并且获得资本关注的主要是通过合并和收购进一步扩张的感知需求。虽然不可能预测CareFirst医疗质量的未来变化,但分析表明,营利性国家管理的医疗公司的质量似乎有些低。需要进一步的研究来评估真正的非营利组织的生存能力,非营利组织和营利性国家管理医疗计划对当地保险和供应商市场演变的潜在影响,以及有效监督非营利健康计划的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信