Fixing Broken Bones and Broken Homes: Domestic Violence as a Patient Safety Issue

Felicia Cohn Ph.D. (Director of Medical Ethics), William J. Rudman Ph.D. (Professor)
{"title":"Fixing Broken Bones and Broken Homes: Domestic Violence as a Patient Safety Issue","authors":"Felicia Cohn Ph.D. (Director of Medical Ethics),&nbsp;William J. Rudman Ph.D. (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30075-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Domestic violence (DV) is a significant problem in terms of both patient harm and cost. To better address this problem, the diagnosis and treatment of DV are considered within the emerging model of patient safety and medical error reduction. The case of a female patient who presents in the clinical setting following an incident of DV shows how medical errors can be analyzed as they are in medical cases not involving DV, such as when a person with abdominal pain is sent away from the emergency department with instructions to take an acid reducer and later suffers a burst appendix.</p></div><div><h3>Root Cause Analysis</h3><p>A number of factors inhibit the correct diagnosis and treatment of DV victims seeking additional treatment. Physicians often fail to screen for DV, misidentify symptoms, or deny the possibility of underlying DV, and patients often hide the symptoms and refuse to admit the problem. However, human factor errors related to knowledge, cultural norms, and individual biases; organizational factors, including lack of training and reimbursement; and technology factors related to information accessibility appear to play significant roles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Failure to diagnose or adequately address DV can be interpreted as medical errors. Addressing DV requires a systemic response, which might begin with integrating education and training about DV into the clinical setting, ensuring the use of existing screening tools, and providing adequate and appropriate reimbursement levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84970,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","volume":"30 11","pages":"Pages 636-646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30075-4","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549374104300754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Domestic violence (DV) is a significant problem in terms of both patient harm and cost. To better address this problem, the diagnosis and treatment of DV are considered within the emerging model of patient safety and medical error reduction. The case of a female patient who presents in the clinical setting following an incident of DV shows how medical errors can be analyzed as they are in medical cases not involving DV, such as when a person with abdominal pain is sent away from the emergency department with instructions to take an acid reducer and later suffers a burst appendix.

Root Cause Analysis

A number of factors inhibit the correct diagnosis and treatment of DV victims seeking additional treatment. Physicians often fail to screen for DV, misidentify symptoms, or deny the possibility of underlying DV, and patients often hide the symptoms and refuse to admit the problem. However, human factor errors related to knowledge, cultural norms, and individual biases; organizational factors, including lack of training and reimbursement; and technology factors related to information accessibility appear to play significant roles.

Conclusion

Failure to diagnose or adequately address DV can be interpreted as medical errors. Addressing DV requires a systemic response, which might begin with integrating education and training about DV into the clinical setting, ensuring the use of existing screening tools, and providing adequate and appropriate reimbursement levels.

修复骨折和破碎的家庭:作为病人安全问题的家庭暴力
家庭暴力(DV)在患者伤害和成本方面都是一个重大问题。为了更好地解决这一问题,DV的诊断和治疗在患者安全和医疗差错减少的新兴模型中被考虑。一名女性患者在家庭暴力事件后出现在临床环境中,这一案例表明,医疗错误可以像在不涉及家庭暴力的医疗病例中一样进行分析,例如,当一个患有腹痛的人被从急诊科送走,并被指示服用酸减减剂,后来又遭受阑尾破裂。根本原因分析对寻求额外治疗的家庭暴力受害者来说,有许多因素阻碍了正确的诊断和治疗。医生往往不能筛查家庭暴力,错误识别症状,或否认潜在家庭暴力的可能性,而患者往往隐藏症状,拒绝承认问题。然而,与知识、文化规范和个人偏见相关的人为因素错误;组织因素,包括缺乏培训和报销;与信息可及性相关的技术因素似乎起着重要作用。结论家庭暴力诊断失败或处理不当可被解释为医疗失误。解决家庭暴力需要一个系统的反应,这可能从将家庭暴力的教育和培训纳入临床环境开始,确保使用现有的筛查工具,并提供充分和适当的报销水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书