Evidence-based evaluation of immunomodulatory therapy for the cutaneous manifestations of lupus.

Advances in dermatology Pub Date : 2004-01-01
Michelle Heath, Gregory J Raugi
{"title":"Evidence-based evaluation of immunomodulatory therapy for the cutaneous manifestations of lupus.","authors":"Michelle Heath,&nbsp;Gregory J Raugi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This literature review revealed an unexpected paucity of data derived from adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials to guide evidence-based treatment of the cutaneous manifestations of lupus. Lupus erythematosus is characterized by spontaneous fluctuations in disease activity. This characteristic may serve to explain some of the contradictions in published evidence and cautions us not to rely too heavily on data derived from inadequately powered studies, small uncontrolled case series, or individual case reports, which are additionally subject to publication bias. Clearly, there is a pressing need to conduct adequately powered clinical research studies to fill these gaps in our knowledge. There also is a need for controlled trials to assess drug safety in patients with SLE. Much of the data regarding side-effect profiles of the immunomodulatory drugs has been compiled in patients receiving organ transplantation or chemotherapy for malignant diseases and extrapolated to patients with lupus. Given that there is often a substantial overlap in symptoms related to drug toxicity and to lupus erythematosus, careful studies should be conducted to assess the safety and toxicities of both established and newer medical therapies, especially those whose efficacy is supported only by small trials and case reports. Table 4 summarizes the results of our literature review. For each drug, we give the highest level of data we found, both for the treatment of lupus erythematosus in general and for the treatment of the cutaneous manifestation of lupus in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":76978,"journal":{"name":"Advances in dermatology","volume":"20 ","pages":"257-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This literature review revealed an unexpected paucity of data derived from adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials to guide evidence-based treatment of the cutaneous manifestations of lupus. Lupus erythematosus is characterized by spontaneous fluctuations in disease activity. This characteristic may serve to explain some of the contradictions in published evidence and cautions us not to rely too heavily on data derived from inadequately powered studies, small uncontrolled case series, or individual case reports, which are additionally subject to publication bias. Clearly, there is a pressing need to conduct adequately powered clinical research studies to fill these gaps in our knowledge. There also is a need for controlled trials to assess drug safety in patients with SLE. Much of the data regarding side-effect profiles of the immunomodulatory drugs has been compiled in patients receiving organ transplantation or chemotherapy for malignant diseases and extrapolated to patients with lupus. Given that there is often a substantial overlap in symptoms related to drug toxicity and to lupus erythematosus, careful studies should be conducted to assess the safety and toxicities of both established and newer medical therapies, especially those whose efficacy is supported only by small trials and case reports. Table 4 summarizes the results of our literature review. For each drug, we give the highest level of data we found, both for the treatment of lupus erythematosus in general and for the treatment of the cutaneous manifestation of lupus in particular.

免疫调节疗法对狼疮皮肤表现的循证评价。
这篇文献综述揭示了一个意想不到的缺乏数据,这些数据来源于足够有力的、随机的、对照的试验,以指导狼疮皮肤表现的循证治疗。红斑狼疮的特点是疾病活动的自发波动。这一特点可能有助于解释已发表证据中的一些矛盾,并提醒我们不要过分依赖来自不充分的研究、小型非控制病例系列或个别病例报告的数据,这些数据也会受到发表偏倚的影响。显然,迫切需要进行充分有力的临床研究来填补我们知识中的这些空白。还需要进行对照试验来评估SLE患者的药物安全性。许多关于免疫调节药物副作用的数据是在接受器官移植或恶性疾病化疗的患者中收集的,并推断为狼疮患者。鉴于与药物毒性和红斑狼疮相关的症状往往存在大量重叠,应进行仔细的研究,以评估现有和较新的医学疗法的安全性和毒性,特别是那些仅由小型试验和病例报告支持疗效的疗法。表4总结了我们文献综述的结果。对于每一种药物,我们都给出了我们发现的最高水平的数据,无论是对红斑狼疮的一般治疗还是对红斑狼疮皮肤表现的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信