A trial design for evaluation of empiric programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators to improve patient management.

John M Morgan, Laurence D Sterns, Jodi L Hanson, Kevin T Ousdigian, Mary F Otterness, Bruce L Wilkoff
{"title":"A trial design for evaluation of empiric programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators to improve patient management.","authors":"John M Morgan,&nbsp;Laurence D Sterns,&nbsp;Jodi L Hanson,&nbsp;Kevin T Ousdigian,&nbsp;Mary F Otterness,&nbsp;Bruce L Wilkoff","doi":"10.1186/1468-6708-5-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The delivery of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is sophisticated and requires the programming of over 100 settings. Physicians tailor these settings with the intention of optimizing ICD therapeutic efficacy, but the usefulness of this approach has not been studied and is unknown. Empiric programming of settings such as anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) has been demonstrated to be effective, but an empiric approach to programming all VT/VF detection and therapy settings has not been studied. A single standardized empiric programming regimen was developed based on key strategies with the intention of restricting shock delivery to circumstances when it is the only effective and appropriate therapy. The EMPIRIC trial is a worldwide, multi-center, prospective, one-to-one randomized comparison of empiric to physician tailored programming for VT/VF detection and therapy in a broad group of about 900 dual chamber ICD patients. The trial will provide a better understanding of how particular programming strategies impact the quantity of shocks delivered and facilitate optimization of complex ICD programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":53230,"journal":{"name":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1468-6708-5-12","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The delivery of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is sophisticated and requires the programming of over 100 settings. Physicians tailor these settings with the intention of optimizing ICD therapeutic efficacy, but the usefulness of this approach has not been studied and is unknown. Empiric programming of settings such as anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) has been demonstrated to be effective, but an empiric approach to programming all VT/VF detection and therapy settings has not been studied. A single standardized empiric programming regimen was developed based on key strategies with the intention of restricting shock delivery to circumstances when it is the only effective and appropriate therapy. The EMPIRIC trial is a worldwide, multi-center, prospective, one-to-one randomized comparison of empiric to physician tailored programming for VT/VF detection and therapy in a broad group of about 900 dual chamber ICD patients. The trial will provide a better understanding of how particular programming strategies impact the quantity of shocks delivered and facilitate optimization of complex ICD programming.

评估植入式心律转复除颤器经验规划以改善患者管理的试验设计。
植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的交付是复杂的,需要超过100个设置的编程。医生调整这些设置的目的是优化ICD的治疗效果,但这种方法的有用性尚未研究,也是未知的。经验规划设置,如抗心动过速起搏(ATP)已被证明是有效的,但经验规划所有VT/VF检测和治疗设置的方法尚未研究。在关键策略的基础上,制定了一个单一的标准化经验规划方案,目的是在休克是唯一有效和适当的治疗方法的情况下限制休克的实施。EMPIRIC试验是一项全球性的、多中心的、前瞻性的、一对一的随机比较,在大约900名双室ICD患者中,对经验和医生定制的VT/VF检测和治疗方案进行比较。该试验将更好地了解特定的编程策略如何影响所传递的冲击数量,并促进复杂ICD编程的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信