{"title":"Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures.","authors":"Nirmal C Tejwani, Pramod Achan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-energy proximal tibia fractures are complicated by soft tissue compromise and this may result in sub-optimal outcomes. There is a high association of open injuries, compartment syndromes, and vascular injuries with these bony disruptions. Surgical treatment of these injuries has been associated with significant complications such as infection, knee stiffness, malunion, loss of fixation, soft tissue failure, and amputations. The loss of fixation is an issue especially in the elderly, with failure associated with age more than sixty years, premature weight bearing, preoperative displacement, fracture fragmentation, and severe osteoporosis. The use of two-stage reconstruction for the treatment of distal tibia fractures has been successful in decreasing the complication rates, including wound compromise. The two stages involve: 1. stabilization of the injured limb with a bridging external fixator to allow the soft tissues to improve and recover and 2. definitive fixation for reconstruction of the articular surface and meta-diaphyseal fractures. The use of such a protocol has been proposed for high-energy proximal tibia fractures to decrease the high rate of soft tissue compromise associated with traditional open methods of treatment. The choice of definitive fixation may include plates, nails, or non-bridging external fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"62-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-energy proximal tibia fractures are complicated by soft tissue compromise and this may result in sub-optimal outcomes. There is a high association of open injuries, compartment syndromes, and vascular injuries with these bony disruptions. Surgical treatment of these injuries has been associated with significant complications such as infection, knee stiffness, malunion, loss of fixation, soft tissue failure, and amputations. The loss of fixation is an issue especially in the elderly, with failure associated with age more than sixty years, premature weight bearing, preoperative displacement, fracture fragmentation, and severe osteoporosis. The use of two-stage reconstruction for the treatment of distal tibia fractures has been successful in decreasing the complication rates, including wound compromise. The two stages involve: 1. stabilization of the injured limb with a bridging external fixator to allow the soft tissues to improve and recover and 2. definitive fixation for reconstruction of the articular surface and meta-diaphyseal fractures. The use of such a protocol has been proposed for high-energy proximal tibia fractures to decrease the high rate of soft tissue compromise associated with traditional open methods of treatment. The choice of definitive fixation may include plates, nails, or non-bridging external fixation.