Increased flexion and reduced hospital stay with continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine after primary total knee replacement: open intervention study of efficacy and safety in 154 patients.

Sten Rasmussen, Morten U Kramhøft, Kim P Sperling, Jens H L Pedersen
{"title":"Increased flexion and reduced hospital stay with continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine after primary total knee replacement: open intervention study of efficacy and safety in 154 patients.","authors":"Sten Rasmussen,&nbsp;Morten U Kramhøft,&nbsp;Kim P Sperling,&nbsp;Jens H L Pedersen","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A single injection of bupivacaine after wound closure reduces the need for analgesics and increases flexion after total knee replacement (TKR). We have therefore studied the effect of continuous injection of morphine and ropivacaine after TKR on range of movement and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In an open intervention study, we assigned 154 consecutive patients who had primary unilateral TKR for osteoarthrosis. The intervention was continuous intraarticular injection of morphine 20 mg/mL, 0.5 mL plus ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 100 mL; bolus 20 mL and 2 mL/hour from 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. Group 1 (10 women and 8 men) received standard postoperative analgesics and group 2 (11 women and 7 men) also received continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine as described above. Group 3 (14 women and 4 men) received double this dose (4 mL/hour) from 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. To assess the safety of the intraarticular treatment, an additional group of 100 consecutive patients was followed (group 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At discharge, flexion was 70 degrees (60-100) in group 1, 100 degrees (70-115) in group 2 and 110 degrees (90-130) in group 3. Hospital stay was reduced from 9 (7-11) days in group 1, to 7 (5-10) days in groups 2 and 3. Number of days elapsed until the patient was walking with crutches was reduced from 5 (3-8) to 4 (3-6) and 3 (3-9), respectively. In the intervention groups, the need for analgesics was reduced during the hospital stay. Deep infection was registered in 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine reduce pain and enhance rehabilitation after total knee replacement. Before advocating this as a standard procedure, further large-scale randomized studies will be needed to assess the safety of this regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 5","pages":"606-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001501","citationCount":"95","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

Abstract

Background: A single injection of bupivacaine after wound closure reduces the need for analgesics and increases flexion after total knee replacement (TKR). We have therefore studied the effect of continuous injection of morphine and ropivacaine after TKR on range of movement and length of hospital stay.

Patients and methods: In an open intervention study, we assigned 154 consecutive patients who had primary unilateral TKR for osteoarthrosis. The intervention was continuous intraarticular injection of morphine 20 mg/mL, 0.5 mL plus ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 100 mL; bolus 20 mL and 2 mL/hour from 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. Group 1 (10 women and 8 men) received standard postoperative analgesics and group 2 (11 women and 7 men) also received continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine as described above. Group 3 (14 women and 4 men) received double this dose (4 mL/hour) from 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. To assess the safety of the intraarticular treatment, an additional group of 100 consecutive patients was followed (group 4).

Results: At discharge, flexion was 70 degrees (60-100) in group 1, 100 degrees (70-115) in group 2 and 110 degrees (90-130) in group 3. Hospital stay was reduced from 9 (7-11) days in group 1, to 7 (5-10) days in groups 2 and 3. Number of days elapsed until the patient was walking with crutches was reduced from 5 (3-8) to 4 (3-6) and 3 (3-9), respectively. In the intervention groups, the need for analgesics was reduced during the hospital stay. Deep infection was registered in 1 patient.

Interpretation: Continuous intraarticular morphine and ropivacaine reduce pain and enhance rehabilitation after total knee replacement. Before advocating this as a standard procedure, further large-scale randomized studies will be needed to assess the safety of this regimen.

初次全膝关节置换术后持续关节内吗啡和罗哌卡因增加屈曲和缩短住院时间:154例患者疗效和安全性的开放式干预研究
背景:伤口闭合后单次注射布比卡因减少了对镇痛药的需求,并增加了全膝关节置换术(TKR)后的屈曲。因此,我们研究了TKR术后持续注射吗啡和罗哌卡因对活动范围和住院时间的影响。患者和方法:在一项开放干预研究中,我们连续分配了154例原发性单侧TKR骨关节病患者。干预措施为持续关节内注射吗啡20 mg/mL、0.5 mL加罗哌卡因2 mg/mL、100 mL;术后24 ~ 72小时,每小时加药20ml和2ml。第1组(10名女性和8名男性)接受标准的术后镇痛药,第2组(11名女性和7名男性)也接受如上所述的持续关节内吗啡和罗哌卡因。第三组(14名女性和4名男性)在术后24至72小时内接受双倍剂量(4ml /小时)。为了评估关节内治疗的安全性,我们对另外一组连续100例患者进行了随访(第4组)。结果:出院时,第1组屈曲70度(60-100),第2组屈曲100度(70-115),第3组屈曲110度(90-130)。住院时间从第1组的9(7-11)天减少到第2和第3组的7(5-10)天。患者使用拐杖行走的天数分别从5(3-8)减少到4(3-6)和3(3-9)。在干预组中,住院期间对镇痛药的需求减少。深部感染1例。解释:关节内持续注射吗啡和罗哌卡因可减轻全膝关节置换术后疼痛并增强康复。在提倡将其作为标准程序之前,需要进一步的大规模随机研究来评估该方案的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信