Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.

Ian Shevill, Geoffrey Hall
{"title":"Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.","authors":"Ian Shevill,&nbsp;Geoffrey Hall","doi":"10.1080/02724990344000178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In four experiments using the conditioned suppression procedure, rats received initial reinforced training with two compound stimuli, AX and BY, each compound consisting of one auditory and one visual element. After a second phase of training consisting of nonreinforced presentations of A, the suppression governed by X and Y was tested. In Experiment 1 X evoked slightly less suppression than Y (a mediated extinction effect). This outcome was obtained when the auditory cues served as X and Y(Experiment 1a), when the visual cues served as X and Y(Experiment 1b), and when the number of nonreinforced presentations of A was increased (Experiment 1c) from 18 to 216. In Experiment 2, however, in which the initial training was given with serial compounds (i.e., A --> X and B --> Y) X evoked more suppression than Y (a recovery-from-overshadowing effect). It was argued that extinction of A engages two learning processes, one increasing the effective associative strength of its associate (X) and one reducing it, and that the balance between these two depends on the specific conditions of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":77438,"journal":{"name":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"57 4","pages":"331-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02724990344000178","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990344000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

In four experiments using the conditioned suppression procedure, rats received initial reinforced training with two compound stimuli, AX and BY, each compound consisting of one auditory and one visual element. After a second phase of training consisting of nonreinforced presentations of A, the suppression governed by X and Y was tested. In Experiment 1 X evoked slightly less suppression than Y (a mediated extinction effect). This outcome was obtained when the auditory cues served as X and Y(Experiment 1a), when the visual cues served as X and Y(Experiment 1b), and when the number of nonreinforced presentations of A was increased (Experiment 1c) from 18 to 216. In Experiment 2, however, in which the initial training was given with serial compounds (i.e., A --> X and B --> Y) X evoked more suppression than Y (a recovery-from-overshadowing effect). It was argued that extinction of A engages two learning processes, one increasing the effective associative strength of its associate (X) and one reducing it, and that the balance between these two depends on the specific conditions of training.

条件抑制过程中的回顾性重估效应。
在四个条件抑制实验中,大鼠接受了两种复合刺激(AX和BY)的初始强化训练,每种复合刺激包括一个听觉和一个视觉元素。在由a的非强化呈现组成的第二阶段训练后,测试了X和Y控制的抑制。在实验1中,X引起的抑制略低于Y(介导的灭绝效应)。当听觉线索作为X和Y时(实验1a),当视觉线索作为X和Y时(实验1b),以及当A的非强化呈现次数从18次增加到216次时(实验1c),得到了这一结果。然而,在实验2中,当初始训练中使用一系列化合物(即A -> X和B -> Y)时,X比Y产生更多的抑制(阴影恢复效应)。有人认为,A的消失涉及两个学习过程,一个是增加其同伙(X)的有效联想强度,另一个是减少它,这两者之间的平衡取决于具体的训练条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信