Effects of pH management during deep hypothermic bypass on cerebral oxygenation: alpha-stat versus pH-stat.

Zhi-jun Li, Xiao-mei Yin, Jian Ye
{"title":"Effects of pH management during deep hypothermic bypass on cerebral oxygenation: alpha-stat versus pH-stat.","authors":"Zhi-jun Li,&nbsp;Xiao-mei Yin,&nbsp;Jian Ye","doi":"10.1631/jzus.2004.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a remarkable lack of scientific evidence to support the option to use alpha-stat or pH-stat management, as to which is more beneficial to brain protection during deep hypothermic CPB. This study examined cortical blood flow (CBF), cerebral oxygenation, and brain oxygen consumption in relation to deep hypothermic CPB with alpha-stat or pH-stat management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two pigs were cooled with alpha-stat or pH-stat during CPB to 15 degrees C esophageal temperature. CBF and cerebral oxygenation were measured continuously with a laser flowmeter and near-infrared spectroscopy, respectively. Brain oxygen consumption was measured with standard laboratory techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During CPB cooling, CBF was significantly decreased, about 52.2%+/-6.3% (P<0.01 vs 92.6%+/-6.5% of pH-stat) at 15 degrees C in alpha-stat, whereas there were no significant changes in CBF in pH-stat. While cooling down, brain oxygen extraction (OER) progressively decreased, about 9.5%+/-0.9% and 10.9%+/-1.5% at 15 degrees C in alpha-stat and pH-stat, respectively. At 31 degrees C the decreased value in pH-stat was lower than in alpha-stat (29.9%+/-2.7% vs 22.5%+/-1.9%; P<0.05). The ratio of CBF/OER were 2.0+/-0.3 in alpha-stat and pH-stat, respectively; it was kept in constant level in alpha-stat, and significantly increased by 19 degrees C to 15 degrees C in pH-stat (4.9+/-0.9 vs 2.3+/-0.4; P<0.01). In mild hypothermia, cerebral oxyhemoglobin and oxygen saturation in alpha-stat were greater than that in pH-stat (102.5%+/-1.4% vs 99.1%+/-0.7%; P<0.05). In deep hypothermia, brain oxygen saturation in pH-stat was greater than that in alpha-stat (99.2%+/-1.0% vs 93.8%+/-1.0%; P<0.01), and deoxyhemoglobin in pH-stat decreased more greatly than that in alpha-stat (28.7%+/-6.8% vs 54.1%+/-4.7%; P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In mild hypothermic CPB, brain tissue oxygen saturation was greater in alpha-stat than in pH-stat. However, cerebral oxygenation and brain tissue oxygen saturation were better in pH-stat than in alpha-stat during profound hypothermia. PH-stat strategy provided much more oxygen to brain tissue before deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.</p>","PeriodicalId":85042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science","volume":"5 10","pages":"1290-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1631/jzus.2004.1290","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2004.1290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: There is a remarkable lack of scientific evidence to support the option to use alpha-stat or pH-stat management, as to which is more beneficial to brain protection during deep hypothermic CPB. This study examined cortical blood flow (CBF), cerebral oxygenation, and brain oxygen consumption in relation to deep hypothermic CPB with alpha-stat or pH-stat management.

Methods: Twenty-two pigs were cooled with alpha-stat or pH-stat during CPB to 15 degrees C esophageal temperature. CBF and cerebral oxygenation were measured continuously with a laser flowmeter and near-infrared spectroscopy, respectively. Brain oxygen consumption was measured with standard laboratory techniques.

Results: During CPB cooling, CBF was significantly decreased, about 52.2%+/-6.3% (P<0.01 vs 92.6%+/-6.5% of pH-stat) at 15 degrees C in alpha-stat, whereas there were no significant changes in CBF in pH-stat. While cooling down, brain oxygen extraction (OER) progressively decreased, about 9.5%+/-0.9% and 10.9%+/-1.5% at 15 degrees C in alpha-stat and pH-stat, respectively. At 31 degrees C the decreased value in pH-stat was lower than in alpha-stat (29.9%+/-2.7% vs 22.5%+/-1.9%; P<0.05). The ratio of CBF/OER were 2.0+/-0.3 in alpha-stat and pH-stat, respectively; it was kept in constant level in alpha-stat, and significantly increased by 19 degrees C to 15 degrees C in pH-stat (4.9+/-0.9 vs 2.3+/-0.4; P<0.01). In mild hypothermia, cerebral oxyhemoglobin and oxygen saturation in alpha-stat were greater than that in pH-stat (102.5%+/-1.4% vs 99.1%+/-0.7%; P<0.05). In deep hypothermia, brain oxygen saturation in pH-stat was greater than that in alpha-stat (99.2%+/-1.0% vs 93.8%+/-1.0%; P<0.01), and deoxyhemoglobin in pH-stat decreased more greatly than that in alpha-stat (28.7%+/-6.8% vs 54.1%+/-4.7%; P<0.05).

Conclusions: In mild hypothermic CPB, brain tissue oxygen saturation was greater in alpha-stat than in pH-stat. However, cerebral oxygenation and brain tissue oxygen saturation were better in pH-stat than in alpha-stat during profound hypothermia. PH-stat strategy provided much more oxygen to brain tissue before deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

深度低温旁路时pH管理对脑氧合的影响:α -stat与pH-stat。
目的:在深度低温CPB中,使用α -stat或pH-stat管理哪种更有利于脑保护,目前明显缺乏科学证据支持。本研究检测了与α -stat或pH-stat管理的深度低温CPB相关的皮质血流量(CBF)、脑氧合和脑耗氧量。方法:将22头猪在CPB过程中用α -stat或pH-stat冷却至15℃食管温度。分别用激光流量计和近红外光谱连续测量脑血流和脑氧合。用标准实验室技术测量脑耗氧量。结果:在CPB降温过程中,CBF明显降低,约为52.2%+/-6.3% (p)结论:轻度低温CPB中,α -状态脑组织氧饱和度高于ph -状态。然而,深度低温时,pH-stat组的脑氧合和脑组织氧饱和度优于α -stat组。PH-stat策略在深度低温循环停止前为脑组织提供了更多的氧气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信