The influence of diabetes mellitus on plaque volume and vessel size in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Shigenori Ito, Takahiko Suzuki, Osamu Katoh, Shinsuke Ojio, Hidetoshi Sato, Mariko Ehara, Tatsuya Ito, Masafumi Myoishi, Yoshiaki Kawase, Ryohei Kurokawa, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Koyo Sato, Junji Toyama, Tatsuya Fukutomi, Makoto Itoh
{"title":"The influence of diabetes mellitus on plaque volume and vessel size in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Shigenori Ito,&nbsp;Takahiko Suzuki,&nbsp;Osamu Katoh,&nbsp;Shinsuke Ojio,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Sato,&nbsp;Mariko Ehara,&nbsp;Tatsuya Ito,&nbsp;Masafumi Myoishi,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Kawase,&nbsp;Ryohei Kurokawa,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Suzuki,&nbsp;Koyo Sato,&nbsp;Junji Toyama,&nbsp;Tatsuya Fukutomi,&nbsp;Makoto Itoh","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the influence of diabetes on plaque volume and vessel size at a reference segment in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using both angiograms and quantitative intravascular ultrasound. A total of 344 patients with 449 de novo coronary lesions including 97 diabetics (133 lesions) who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention under intravascular ultrasound guidance were included in this study. Eleven diabetic patients (19 lesions) received insulin and 52 patients (77 lesions) oral hypoglycemic drugs. The other 34 patients (37 lesions) received diet/exercise therapy alone. We measured vessel area (VA) and lumen area (LA) at proximal and distal reference segments by intravascular ultrasound, which were averaged. Plaque area (VA-LA) and % plaque area (100 x plaque area/VA) were subsequently calculated. Although VA was similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (13.46 +/- 4.49 mm2 in diabetics versus 14.11 +/- 5.24 mm2 in non-diabetics, P = 0.214), LA was smaller (6.51 +/- 2.63 mm2 versus 7.38 +/- 3.08 mm2, P = 0.004) and % PA was larger (50.4 +/- 11.7 versus 46.5 +/- 11.3, P < 0.001) in diabetic patients, especially the group receiving a hypoglycemic drug or insulin. VA, LA, and % PA were similar between patients with and without insulin treatment. These results potentially might cause undersized device selection without intravascular ultrasound guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of diabetes on plaque volume and vessel size at a reference segment in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using both angiograms and quantitative intravascular ultrasound. A total of 344 patients with 449 de novo coronary lesions including 97 diabetics (133 lesions) who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention under intravascular ultrasound guidance were included in this study. Eleven diabetic patients (19 lesions) received insulin and 52 patients (77 lesions) oral hypoglycemic drugs. The other 34 patients (37 lesions) received diet/exercise therapy alone. We measured vessel area (VA) and lumen area (LA) at proximal and distal reference segments by intravascular ultrasound, which were averaged. Plaque area (VA-LA) and % plaque area (100 x plaque area/VA) were subsequently calculated. Although VA was similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (13.46 +/- 4.49 mm2 in diabetics versus 14.11 +/- 5.24 mm2 in non-diabetics, P = 0.214), LA was smaller (6.51 +/- 2.63 mm2 versus 7.38 +/- 3.08 mm2, P = 0.004) and % PA was larger (50.4 +/- 11.7 versus 46.5 +/- 11.3, P < 0.001) in diabetic patients, especially the group receiving a hypoglycemic drug or insulin. VA, LA, and % PA were similar between patients with and without insulin treatment. These results potentially might cause undersized device selection without intravascular ultrasound guidance.

糖尿病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者斑块体积和血管大小的影响。
我们评估了糖尿病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者斑块体积和血管大小的影响,同时使用血管造影和定量血管内超声。本研究共纳入344例在血管内超声引导下择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的449例新发冠状动脉病变患者,其中糖尿病患者97例(133个病变)。11例患者(19个病变)接受胰岛素治疗,52例患者(77个病变)接受口服降糖药治疗。其他34例患者(37个病变)单独接受饮食/运动治疗。我们通过血管内超声测量近端和远端参考节段的血管面积(VA)和管腔面积(LA),取平均值。随后计算斑块面积(VA- la)和斑块面积% (100 x斑块面积/VA)。虽然糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的VA相似(糖尿病患者为13.46 +/- 4.49 mm2,非糖尿病患者为14.11 +/- 5.24 mm2, P = 0.214),但糖尿病患者的LA较小(6.51 +/- 2.63 mm2,非糖尿病患者为7.38 +/- 3.08 mm2, P = 0.004), % PA较大(50.4 +/- 11.7,非糖尿病患者为46.5 +/- 11.3,P < 0.001),特别是接受降糖药物或胰岛素治疗的患者。在接受和未接受胰岛素治疗的患者中,VA、LA和% PA相似。这些结果可能会导致在没有血管内超声引导的情况下选择尺寸过小的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信