Evaluation of cage micro-environment of mice housed on various types of bedding materials.

Ellen Smith, Jason D Stockwell, Isabelle Schweitzer, Stephen H Langley, Abigail L Smith
{"title":"Evaluation of cage micro-environment of mice housed on various types of bedding materials.","authors":"Ellen Smith,&nbsp;Jason D Stockwell,&nbsp;Isabelle Schweitzer,&nbsp;Stephen H Langley,&nbsp;Abigail L Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A variety of environmental factors can affect the outcomes of studies using laboratory rodents. One such factor is bedding. Several new bedding materials and processing methods have been introduced to the market in recent years, but there are few reports of their performance. In the studies reported here, we have assessed the cage micro-environment (in-cage ammonia levels, temperature, and humidity) of mice housed on various kinds of bedding and their combinations. We also compared results for bedding supplied as Nestpaks versus loose bedding. We studied C57BL/6J mice (commonly used) and NOD/LtJ mice (heavy soilers) that were maintained, except in one study, in static duplex cages. In general, we observed little effect of bedding type on in-cage temperature or humidity; however, there was considerable variation in ammonia concentrations. The lowest ammonia concentrations occurred in cages housing mice on hardwood bedding or a mixture of corncob and alpha cellulose. In one experiment comparing the micro-environments of NOD/LtJ male mice housed on woodpulp fiber bedding in static versus ventilated caging, we showed a statistically significant decrease in ammonia concentrations in ventilated cages. Therefore, our data show that bedding type affects the micro-environment in static cages and that effects may differ for ventilated cages, which are being used in vivaria with increasing frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":80269,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science","volume":"43 4","pages":"12-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of environmental factors can affect the outcomes of studies using laboratory rodents. One such factor is bedding. Several new bedding materials and processing methods have been introduced to the market in recent years, but there are few reports of their performance. In the studies reported here, we have assessed the cage micro-environment (in-cage ammonia levels, temperature, and humidity) of mice housed on various kinds of bedding and their combinations. We also compared results for bedding supplied as Nestpaks versus loose bedding. We studied C57BL/6J mice (commonly used) and NOD/LtJ mice (heavy soilers) that were maintained, except in one study, in static duplex cages. In general, we observed little effect of bedding type on in-cage temperature or humidity; however, there was considerable variation in ammonia concentrations. The lowest ammonia concentrations occurred in cages housing mice on hardwood bedding or a mixture of corncob and alpha cellulose. In one experiment comparing the micro-environments of NOD/LtJ male mice housed on woodpulp fiber bedding in static versus ventilated caging, we showed a statistically significant decrease in ammonia concentrations in ventilated cages. Therefore, our data show that bedding type affects the micro-environment in static cages and that effects may differ for ventilated cages, which are being used in vivaria with increasing frequency.

不同床上材料饲养小鼠笼微环境评价。
多种环境因素可以影响使用实验室啮齿动物的研究结果。其中一个因素就是床上用品。近年来,市场上出现了几种新的床上用品材料和加工方法,但关于其性能的报道很少。在本文报道的研究中,我们评估了在不同床上及其组合上饲养的小鼠的笼内微环境(笼内氨水平、温度和湿度)。我们还比较了以Nestpaks形式供应的床上用品和松散床上用品的结果。我们研究了C57BL/6J小鼠(常用)和NOD/LtJ小鼠(重度脏鼠),除了一项研究外,它们都被维持在静态双笼中。总的来说,我们观察到垫层类型对笼内温度和湿度的影响很小;然而,氨浓度有相当大的变化。氨浓度最低的是硬木垫层或玉米芯和α -纤维素混合的笼子。在一项实验中,我们比较了在木浆纤维垫层上饲养的NOD/LtJ雄性小鼠在静态和通风笼子中的微环境,我们发现通风笼子中氨浓度有统计学意义上的降低。因此,我们的数据表明,床层类型会影响静态笼中的微环境,而通风笼的影响可能会有所不同,而通风笼的使用频率越来越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信