Magnetic reasonance imaging of the surgically repaired meniscus: a 13-year follow-up study of 13 knees.

Franky Steenbrugge, Koenraad Verstraete, René Verdonk
{"title":"Magnetic reasonance imaging of the surgically repaired meniscus: a 13-year follow-up study of 13 knees.","authors":"Franky Steenbrugge,&nbsp;Koenraad Verstraete,&nbsp;René Verdonk","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was initiated to evaluate the long-term outcome of meniscal sutures and to correlate clinical findings with MRI findings. We were interested to see if a clinically healed meniscus also showed as such on MRI and if degenerative changes were present</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We studied prospectively 13 patients (7 men) aged between 29 and 50 years, who had undergone closed meniscus repair between 1985 and 1988 using an inside-out technique, clinically and with MRI, with a mean follow-up time of 13 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meniscal suture gave good clinical long-term results: all patients got a Hospital for Special Surgery score of more than 75%. In all patients the site of the previous suture was still visible on MRI, mainly from small metal artefacts in the meniscus. 4 of 7 patients with an unrepaired ACL lesion had signs of arthrosis and cartilage degeneration. MRI showed signs of mucoid degeneration or scar tissue in 6/13 of the patients.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We believe that asymptomatic meniscal tears produce abnormal MR signals even though they have stable unions, and that MR signals at the site of repair represent edematous scar tissue, not true nonunions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 3","pages":"323-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001268","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: This study was initiated to evaluate the long-term outcome of meniscal sutures and to correlate clinical findings with MRI findings. We were interested to see if a clinically healed meniscus also showed as such on MRI and if degenerative changes were present

Patients and methods: We studied prospectively 13 patients (7 men) aged between 29 and 50 years, who had undergone closed meniscus repair between 1985 and 1988 using an inside-out technique, clinically and with MRI, with a mean follow-up time of 13 years.

Results: Meniscal suture gave good clinical long-term results: all patients got a Hospital for Special Surgery score of more than 75%. In all patients the site of the previous suture was still visible on MRI, mainly from small metal artefacts in the meniscus. 4 of 7 patients with an unrepaired ACL lesion had signs of arthrosis and cartilage degeneration. MRI showed signs of mucoid degeneration or scar tissue in 6/13 of the patients.

Interpretation: We believe that asymptomatic meniscal tears produce abnormal MR signals even though they have stable unions, and that MR signals at the site of repair represent edematous scar tissue, not true nonunions.

手术修复半月板的磁导成像:13个膝关节的13年随访研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估半月板缝合的长期结果,并将临床表现与MRI表现联系起来。我们感兴趣的是临床愈合的半月板是否在MRI上也显示出这种情况,以及是否存在退行性改变。患者和方法:我们前瞻性研究了13例患者(7名男性),年龄在29至50岁之间,他们在1985年至1988年期间接受了闭合性半月板修复,使用了由内到外的技术,临床和MRI,平均随访时间为13年。结果:半月板缝合具有良好的临床远期效果,所有患者的专科外科评分均在75%以上。所有患者在MRI上仍然可以看到先前缝合的位置,主要是半月板上的小金属假物。7例未修复的前交叉韧带病变患者中有4例有关节和软骨变性的迹象。MRI显示6/13例患者有粘液变性或瘢痕组织征象。解释:我们认为无症状的半月板撕裂即使愈合稳定,也会产生异常的MR信号,并且修复部位的MR信号代表肿胀的疤痕组织,而不是真正的不愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信