Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments.

Dominik Parsch, Caroline Diehm, Sven Schneider, Andrew New, Steffen J Breusch
{"title":"Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments.","authors":"Dominik Parsch,&nbsp;Caroline Diehm,&nbsp;Sven Schneider,&nbsp;Andrew New,&nbsp;Steffen J Breusch","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are few studies on the effect of acetabular cup design on cement penetration.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We evaluated the effects of an acetabular flange on cement pressurization and cement penetration in 12 cadavers. Flanged or unflanged cups were implanted in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding pressure but without cement pressurization before insertion of the cup. Three pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular peak and average pressures during cup insertion. Following implantation, the whole specimens were AP-radiographed and standardized sections through the acetabula were microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flanged cups produced greater intra-acetabular peak pressures than unflanged cups, but did not increase the average intra-acetabular pressure. Cement penetration did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings do not support the use of flanged cups as the sole means of cement pressurization in the acetabulum.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 3","pages":"269-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001196","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Background: There are few studies on the effect of acetabular cup design on cement penetration.

Material and methods: We evaluated the effects of an acetabular flange on cement pressurization and cement penetration in 12 cadavers. Flanged or unflanged cups were implanted in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding pressure but without cement pressurization before insertion of the cup. Three pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular peak and average pressures during cup insertion. Following implantation, the whole specimens were AP-radiographed and standardized sections through the acetabula were microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration.

Results: Flanged cups produced greater intra-acetabular peak pressures than unflanged cups, but did not increase the average intra-acetabular pressure. Cement penetration did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Interpretation: Our findings do not support the use of flanged cups as the sole means of cement pressurization in the acetabulum.

髋臼骨水泥技术在THA中的应用——有法兰杯与无法兰杯,尸体实验。
背景:目前关于髋臼杯设计对骨水泥入路影响的研究较少。材料和方法:我们在12具尸体中评估了髋臼法兰对水泥加压和水泥渗透的影响。在模拟骨内出血压力的情况下,将带法兰或无法兰的假杯植入配对的人髋臼,但在假杯插入前没有水泥加压。使用三个压力传感器记录髋臼杯插入期间髋臼内峰值和平均压力。植入后,对整个标本进行ap摄影,并对穿过髋臼的标准化切片进行显微摄影以评估骨水泥的穿透性。结果:有法兰的髋臼杯比无法兰的髋臼杯产生更大的髋臼内峰值压力,但没有增加髋臼内平均压力。两组间骨水泥穿透性无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果不支持使用带法兰的骨杯作为髋臼内固定加压的唯一手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信