Farhad Mazoochian, Christoph Pellengahr, Armin Huber, Jörn Kircher, Hans Jürgen Refior, Volkmar Jansson
{"title":"Low accuracy of stem implantation in THR using the CASPAR-system: anteversion measurements in 10 hips.","authors":"Farhad Mazoochian, Christoph Pellengahr, Armin Huber, Jörn Kircher, Hans Jürgen Refior, Volkmar Jansson","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied 10 patients by means of pre- and postoperative CT who underwent computer-assisted total hip replacement using the CASPAR-system (OrthoMaquet GmbH, Rastatt, Germany). The anteversion angles of the stem and translational deviations measured after surgery were compared to the preoperatively planned ones as a quality control. We found an average difference of 7.8 degrees (SD 6.3 degrees; 95% CI 3.3 degrees-12.3 degrees) in the angles and an average difference of 1.8 (SD 1.7; 95% CI 0.6-3.0) mm and 1.2 (SD 1.4: 95% CI 0.25-2.2), respectively, in the medial and lateral deviation. In conclusion, we could not confirm the same accuracy of implant position as that claimed by the manufacturer.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 3","pages":"261-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001178","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
We studied 10 patients by means of pre- and postoperative CT who underwent computer-assisted total hip replacement using the CASPAR-system (OrthoMaquet GmbH, Rastatt, Germany). The anteversion angles of the stem and translational deviations measured after surgery were compared to the preoperatively planned ones as a quality control. We found an average difference of 7.8 degrees (SD 6.3 degrees; 95% CI 3.3 degrees-12.3 degrees) in the angles and an average difference of 1.8 (SD 1.7; 95% CI 0.6-3.0) mm and 1.2 (SD 1.4: 95% CI 0.25-2.2), respectively, in the medial and lateral deviation. In conclusion, we could not confirm the same accuracy of implant position as that claimed by the manufacturer.