A cost analysis of three methods of treating femoral shaft fractures in children: a comparison of traction in hospital, traction in hospital/home and external fixation.

Hanne Hedin, Lars Borgquist, Sune Larsson
{"title":"A cost analysis of three methods of treating femoral shaft fractures in children: a comparison of traction in hospital, traction in hospital/home and external fixation.","authors":"Hanne Hedin,&nbsp;Lars Borgquist,&nbsp;Sune Larsson","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus as to which is best treatment of femoral fractures in children.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a cost analysis comparing three treatments of femoral shaft fractures in children aged 3-15 years at 3 hospitals during the same period (1993-2000). The analysis included total medical costs and costs for the care provider and were calculated from the time of injury up to 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At hospital 1, treatment consisted of external fixation and early mobilization. At hospital 2, the treatment was skin or skeletal traction in hospital for 1-2 weeks, followed by home traction. At hospital 3, treatment was skin or skeletal traction in hospital until the fracture healed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average total costs per patient were EUR 10,000 at hospital 1, EUR 23,000 at hospital 2, and EUR 38,000 at hospital 3.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The main factor for determining the cost of treatment was the number of days in hospital, which was lower in children treated with external fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 3","pages":"241-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001141","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus as to which is best treatment of femoral fractures in children.

Patients and methods: We performed a cost analysis comparing three treatments of femoral shaft fractures in children aged 3-15 years at 3 hospitals during the same period (1993-2000). The analysis included total medical costs and costs for the care provider and were calculated from the time of injury up to 1 year.

Results: At hospital 1, treatment consisted of external fixation and early mobilization. At hospital 2, the treatment was skin or skeletal traction in hospital for 1-2 weeks, followed by home traction. At hospital 3, treatment was skin or skeletal traction in hospital until the fracture healed.

Results: The average total costs per patient were EUR 10,000 at hospital 1, EUR 23,000 at hospital 2, and EUR 38,000 at hospital 3.

Interpretation: The main factor for determining the cost of treatment was the number of days in hospital, which was lower in children treated with external fixation.

儿童股骨干骨折三种治疗方法的成本分析:医院牵引、医院/家庭牵引和外固定的比较
儿童股骨干骨折的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。患者和方法:我们对3家医院同一时期(1993-2000年)3-15岁儿童股骨干骨折的三种治疗方法进行了成本分析。分析包括总医疗费用和护理提供者的费用,并从受伤时间计算到1年。结果:在医院1,治疗包括外固定和早期活动。在医院2,治疗方法为皮肤或骨骼在医院牵引1-2周,然后在家牵引。在第三医院,治疗是在医院进行皮肤或骨骼牵引,直到骨折愈合。结果:医院1每位患者的平均总费用为10,000欧元,医院2为23,000欧元,医院3为38,000欧元。解释:决定治疗费用的主要因素是住院天数,使用外固定支架治疗的儿童住院天数较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信