Reproducibility of intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy subjects.

Akira Kisanuki, Toshinori Yuasa, Eiji Kuwahara, Kunitsugu Takasaki, Shiro Yoshifuku, Yutaka Otsuji, Shinichi Minagoe, Chuwa Tei
{"title":"Reproducibility of intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy subjects.","authors":"Akira Kisanuki,&nbsp;Toshinori Yuasa,&nbsp;Eiji Kuwahara,&nbsp;Kunitsugu Takasaki,&nbsp;Shiro Yoshifuku,&nbsp;Yutaka Otsuji,&nbsp;Shinichi Minagoe,&nbsp;Chuwa Tei","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few data have been published on the reproducibility of baseline subtracted peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography. We investigated the reproducibility of the peak intensity measured from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in 10 young healthy males. The contrast echocardiography was obtained using the second harmonic mode with an intravenous bolus injection of Levovist (first study). The same myocardial contrast echocardiography was repeated after the first study (second study). The myocardial opacification and peak intensity in the 12 segments of the apical 4 and 2 chamber views were assessed visually and quantitatively. The differences in the peak intensity between the initial and repeated measurements in the first study (intraobserver reproducibility) and between the initial measurements in the first and second studies (interinjection reproducibility) were assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The degree of opacification was good or intermediate in 207/228 (91%) of the segments. The agreement of myocardial opacification between the first and second studies was 87/114 (76%). However, significantly higher peak intensity was obtained in apical septal (8200 +/- 6300 au2) and mid septal (8500 +/- 6000 au2) segments in the 4 chamber view and in the mid inferior (12400 +/- 9300 au2) and apical inferior (10700 +/- 6300 au2) segments in the 2 chamber view compared with other segments. The mean differences of the peak intensities according to the Bland and Altman analysis was -1600 +/- 5000 au2 in the intraobserver reproducibility study, and -1100 +/- 5300 au2 in the interinjection reproducibility study. Thus, the measurement error was determined to range from 8400 au2 to 9500 au2 in both studies. We conclude that the peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography using Levovist varies significantly among segments in the left ventricular myocardium. Large intraobserver and interinjection variability exists in the measurement of peak intensity, suggesting that the reproducibility of this technique is limited for quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Few data have been published on the reproducibility of baseline subtracted peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography. We investigated the reproducibility of the peak intensity measured from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in 10 young healthy males. The contrast echocardiography was obtained using the second harmonic mode with an intravenous bolus injection of Levovist (first study). The same myocardial contrast echocardiography was repeated after the first study (second study). The myocardial opacification and peak intensity in the 12 segments of the apical 4 and 2 chamber views were assessed visually and quantitatively. The differences in the peak intensity between the initial and repeated measurements in the first study (intraobserver reproducibility) and between the initial measurements in the first and second studies (interinjection reproducibility) were assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The degree of opacification was good or intermediate in 207/228 (91%) of the segments. The agreement of myocardial opacification between the first and second studies was 87/114 (76%). However, significantly higher peak intensity was obtained in apical septal (8200 +/- 6300 au2) and mid septal (8500 +/- 6000 au2) segments in the 4 chamber view and in the mid inferior (12400 +/- 9300 au2) and apical inferior (10700 +/- 6300 au2) segments in the 2 chamber view compared with other segments. The mean differences of the peak intensities according to the Bland and Altman analysis was -1600 +/- 5000 au2 in the intraobserver reproducibility study, and -1100 +/- 5300 au2 in the interinjection reproducibility study. Thus, the measurement error was determined to range from 8400 au2 to 9500 au2 in both studies. We conclude that the peak intensity obtained from intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography using Levovist varies significantly among segments in the left ventricular myocardium. Large intraobserver and interinjection variability exists in the measurement of peak intensity, suggesting that the reproducibility of this technique is limited for quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion.

静脉间断触发心肌对比超声心动图在健康受试者中的再现性。
关于静脉间断触发心肌对比超声心动图获得的基线减去峰值强度的可重复性的数据很少。我们在10名年轻健康男性中研究了静脉间断触发心肌对比超声心动图测量的峰值强度的可重复性。超声心动图造影采用二次谐波模式,静脉注射Levovist(第一项研究)。在第一项研究(第二项研究)后重复同样的心肌超声造影术。定量评价心尖4室和2室12段心肌浊度和峰值强度。使用Bland和Altman方法评估第一项研究中初始和重复测量之间的峰强度差异(观察者内可重复性)以及第一项研究和第二项研究中初始测量之间的峰强度差异(注射间可重复性)。207/228(91%)节段的混浊程度为良好或中等。第一和第二项研究中心肌混浊的一致性为87/114(76%)。然而,与其他段相比,在4室视图中,顶间隔(8200 +/- 6300 au2)和中间隔(8500 +/- 6000 au2)段和2室视图中,中下段(12400 +/- 9300 au2)和顶下段(10700 +/- 6300 au2)的峰值强度明显更高。根据Bland和Altman分析,在观察者内重复性研究中,峰强度的平均差异为-1600 +/- 5000 au2,在注射间重复性研究中,峰强度的平均差异为-1100 +/- 5300 au2。因此,在两项研究中,测量误差确定在8400 au2到9500 au2之间。我们得出结论,静脉间断触发心肌对比超声心动图所获得的峰值强度在左心室心肌各节段之间有显著差异。峰强度的测量存在较大的观察者内和注射间变异性,这表明该技术在定量评估心肌灌注时的可重复性有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信