Miscoding as a Cause of Elevated Simple Pneumonia Mortality

Hewitt Goodpasture M.D. (Medical Director), Chau-Thuong Nguyen-Dang M.D., Tony H. Lee M.D., Paula G. Ghazarian R.N., B.S.N., C.I.C. (Infection Control Coordinator), Mary A. Fulton R.N., B.S.N., C.I.C. (Infection Control Coordinator)
{"title":"Miscoding as a Cause of Elevated Simple Pneumonia Mortality","authors":"Hewitt Goodpasture M.D. (Medical Director),&nbsp;Chau-Thuong Nguyen-Dang M.D.,&nbsp;Tony H. Lee M.D.,&nbsp;Paula G. Ghazarian R.N., B.S.N., C.I.C. (Infection Control Coordinator),&nbsp;Mary A. Fulton R.N., B.S.N., C.I.C. (Infection Control Coordinator)","doi":"10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30038-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An independent health care evaluating organization reported on the Internet that the 1996–1998 mortality rate for simple pneumonia (one of the diagnoses in diagnosis-related group [DRG] 89) was 11.06% (expected rate, 7.69%)—a rate much higher than suggested by the medical center’s prospective quality surveillance. Chart review was undertaken to explain this reported higher mortality rate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-hundred forty-six charts of patients (123 expired, and 123 alive at discharge) were reviewed; each chart concluded with a principal diagnosis. The differences between the originally coded principal diagnosis and the recoded principal diagnoses were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Application of <em>Coding Clinic</em> guidelines revealed that a principal diagnosis of simple pneumonia should have been coded in only 85 (34.6%) of the charts. The remaining charts should have been coded as respiratory failure (13.8%), congestive heart failure (11.4%), respiratory infections and inflammations (7.7%), and other diagnoses (32.5%). Coding occurred prior to discharge summary dictation in 48.4% of the cases. On the basis of the findings, the actual calculated mortality rate of simple pneumonia was 6.6%.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Coding in advance of discharge summary completion and nonexplicit documentation of the principal diagnoses occurred frequently. Reasons for miscoding included failure to distinguish between principal and final diagnoses, delay in discharge summary dictation, and inadequate documentation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84970,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 335-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30038-9","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549374104300389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background

An independent health care evaluating organization reported on the Internet that the 1996–1998 mortality rate for simple pneumonia (one of the diagnoses in diagnosis-related group [DRG] 89) was 11.06% (expected rate, 7.69%)—a rate much higher than suggested by the medical center’s prospective quality surveillance. Chart review was undertaken to explain this reported higher mortality rate.

Methods

Two-hundred forty-six charts of patients (123 expired, and 123 alive at discharge) were reviewed; each chart concluded with a principal diagnosis. The differences between the originally coded principal diagnosis and the recoded principal diagnoses were examined.

Results

Application of Coding Clinic guidelines revealed that a principal diagnosis of simple pneumonia should have been coded in only 85 (34.6%) of the charts. The remaining charts should have been coded as respiratory failure (13.8%), congestive heart failure (11.4%), respiratory infections and inflammations (7.7%), and other diagnoses (32.5%). Coding occurred prior to discharge summary dictation in 48.4% of the cases. On the basis of the findings, the actual calculated mortality rate of simple pneumonia was 6.6%.

Discussion

Coding in advance of discharge summary completion and nonexplicit documentation of the principal diagnoses occurred frequently. Reasons for miscoding included failure to distinguish between principal and final diagnoses, delay in discharge summary dictation, and inadequate documentation.

错误编码是单纯性肺炎死亡率升高的原因
一家独立的医疗保健评估机构在互联网上报道,1996-1998年单纯性肺炎(诊断相关组[DRG] 89中的诊断之一)的死亡率为11.06%(预期死亡率为7.69%),远高于医疗中心前瞻性质量监测的建议。对图表进行了审查,以解释报告的较高死亡率。方法回顾性分析患者病历246份(出院时存活123例,过期123例);每张图表最后都有一个主要的诊断。分析了原编码主诊断与重新编码主诊断的差异。结果编码临床指南的应用显示,单纯性肺炎的主要诊断仅在85张(34.6%)的图表中被编码。其余的图表应该被编码为呼吸衰竭(13.8%)、充血性心力衰竭(11.4%)、呼吸道感染和炎症(7.7%)和其他诊断(32.5%)。在48.4%的病例中,编码发生在出院总结口述之前。在此基础上,单纯性肺炎的实际计算死亡率为6.6%。讨论出院总结完成前的编码和主要诊断的不明确记录经常发生。错误编码的原因包括不能区分主要诊断和最终诊断,延迟出院总结口述,和不充分的文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书