Assessment of risk factors for coronary heart disease in vascular medicine: long-term experience and a personal view from the laboratory.

Pierre N M Demacker
{"title":"Assessment of risk factors for coronary heart disease in vascular medicine: long-term experience and a personal view from the laboratory.","authors":"Pierre N M Demacker","doi":"10.1055/s-2004-822983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians should be properly informed of the clinical chemistry diagnostic potential for the diagnosis and classification of hyper- and dyslipidemias by laboratory determinations of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. New analytes are regularly found to be relevant for screening and risk estimation for coronary artery disease in vascular medicine. These analytes can be distinguished between parameters working on the long-term or working acutely. However, in times of restricted laboratory budgets, it is not always possible to add the new analyte to the routine diagnostic supply without having answered the question of whether the new analyte indeed adds to the chronic or acute risk estimation power presently available. This is relevant for homocysteine and for C-reactive protein (CRP). Both parameters appear to be interrelated to most common cardiovascular risk factors supposed to promote atherosclerosis and to ultimately provoke cardiovascular disease, and in fact are not independent. The latter certainly has added value in acute situations. With regard to the chronic risk estimators, it must be concluded that there is a multifactorial influence, with an important contribution made by social and lifestyle factors. This review draws attention to the multifactorial aspects of coronary heart disease, risk profiling using computer programs, socioeconomic factors, and implementation problems of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87139,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in vascular medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-822983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in vascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-822983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicians should be properly informed of the clinical chemistry diagnostic potential for the diagnosis and classification of hyper- and dyslipidemias by laboratory determinations of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. New analytes are regularly found to be relevant for screening and risk estimation for coronary artery disease in vascular medicine. These analytes can be distinguished between parameters working on the long-term or working acutely. However, in times of restricted laboratory budgets, it is not always possible to add the new analyte to the routine diagnostic supply without having answered the question of whether the new analyte indeed adds to the chronic or acute risk estimation power presently available. This is relevant for homocysteine and for C-reactive protein (CRP). Both parameters appear to be interrelated to most common cardiovascular risk factors supposed to promote atherosclerosis and to ultimately provoke cardiovascular disease, and in fact are not independent. The latter certainly has added value in acute situations. With regard to the chronic risk estimators, it must be concluded that there is a multifactorial influence, with an important contribution made by social and lifestyle factors. This review draws attention to the multifactorial aspects of coronary heart disease, risk profiling using computer programs, socioeconomic factors, and implementation problems of interventions.

血管医学中冠心病危险因素的评估:长期经验和实验室个人观点。
通过实验室检测脂质、脂蛋白和载脂蛋白,应适当告知医生在诊断和分类高血脂和血脂异常方面的临床化学诊断潜力。在血管医学中,经常发现新的分析物与冠状动脉疾病的筛查和风险估计有关。这些分析物可以区分长期工作或剧烈工作的参数。然而,在实验室预算有限的情况下,在没有回答新分析物是否确实增加了目前可用的慢性或急性风险评估能力的问题之前,将新分析物添加到常规诊断供应中并不总是可能的。这与同型半胱氨酸和c反应蛋白(CRP)有关。这两个参数似乎都与最常见的心血管危险因素相关,这些因素被认为会促进动脉粥样硬化,并最终引发心血管疾病,而实际上并不是独立的。后者当然在紧急情况下具有附加价值。关于慢性风险估计,必须得出结论,存在多因素影响,其中社会和生活方式因素发挥了重要作用。这篇综述将关注冠心病的多因素方面、使用计算机程序的风险分析、社会经济因素和干预措施的实施问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信