Non-invasive assessment of atherosclerosis risk.

J David Spence, Robert A Hegele
{"title":"Non-invasive assessment of atherosclerosis risk.","authors":"J David Spence,&nbsp;Robert A Hegele","doi":"10.2174/1568006043336294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reasons to measure atherosclerosis include 1) risk stratification and prediction; 2) evaluation of patient response to interventions; and 3) identification of novel genetic, cellular and molecular determinants of risk. Atherosclerosis can be quantified non-invasively using the increasingly reliable and precise modalities described in this issue, which include ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. While each modality assesses \"atherosclerosis\", the particular morphological entities captured may reflect different aspects of atherogenesis with different biological determinants. For instance, among carotid ultrasound determinations, intima-media thickness (IMT) may reflect medial hypertrophy from hypertension, while plaque volume and stenosis and calcium deposition may additionally reflect foam cell proliferation, scarring and/or thrombosis. Clarifying the biological and clinical correlates of images may guide the choice of modality for specific applications. In addition, these tools are presently used to assess structures at a single time point. However, using them to follow temporal changes may further enhance their value. In this regard, certain modalities, such as ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque area or volume, may be more sensitive than others, such as assessment of IMT, for detecting temporal changes in atherosclerosis. Combining modalities--and adding new biomarkers of disease--may be necessary to grasp the full complex vascular phenotypic picture--\"phenomics\"--of both individual subjects and groups of patients. In evaluating new determinants and novel therapies, it will be important to consider the biology and clinical correlates of a specific measured atherosclerosis phenotype in order to select the most appropriate modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":84523,"journal":{"name":"Current drug targets. Cardiovascular & haematological disorders","volume":"4 2","pages":"125-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1568006043336294","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug targets. Cardiovascular & haematological disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1568006043336294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

The reasons to measure atherosclerosis include 1) risk stratification and prediction; 2) evaluation of patient response to interventions; and 3) identification of novel genetic, cellular and molecular determinants of risk. Atherosclerosis can be quantified non-invasively using the increasingly reliable and precise modalities described in this issue, which include ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. While each modality assesses "atherosclerosis", the particular morphological entities captured may reflect different aspects of atherogenesis with different biological determinants. For instance, among carotid ultrasound determinations, intima-media thickness (IMT) may reflect medial hypertrophy from hypertension, while plaque volume and stenosis and calcium deposition may additionally reflect foam cell proliferation, scarring and/or thrombosis. Clarifying the biological and clinical correlates of images may guide the choice of modality for specific applications. In addition, these tools are presently used to assess structures at a single time point. However, using them to follow temporal changes may further enhance their value. In this regard, certain modalities, such as ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque area or volume, may be more sensitive than others, such as assessment of IMT, for detecting temporal changes in atherosclerosis. Combining modalities--and adding new biomarkers of disease--may be necessary to grasp the full complex vascular phenotypic picture--"phenomics"--of both individual subjects and groups of patients. In evaluating new determinants and novel therapies, it will be important to consider the biology and clinical correlates of a specific measured atherosclerosis phenotype in order to select the most appropriate modality.

动脉粥样硬化风险的无创评估。
测量动脉粥样硬化的原因包括:1)危险分层和预测;2)评估患者对干预措施的反应;3)鉴定新的遗传、细胞和分子的风险决定因素。动脉粥样硬化可以使用越来越可靠和精确的方法进行无创量化,包括超声和磁共振成像。虽然每种模式都评估“动脉粥样硬化”,但捕获的特定形态实体可能反映动脉粥样硬化的不同方面,具有不同的生物学决定因素。例如,在颈动脉超声检测中,内膜-中膜厚度(IMT)可能反映高血压引起的内侧肥大,而斑块体积、狭窄和钙沉积也可能反映泡沫细胞增殖、瘢痕形成和/或血栓形成。明确图像的生物学和临床相关性可以指导特定应用的模式选择。此外,这些工具目前用于在单个时间点评估结构。然而,使用它们来跟踪时间变化可能会进一步提高它们的价值。在这方面,某些方式,如超声评估颈动脉斑块面积或体积,可能比其他方式更敏感,如评估IMT,以检测动脉粥样硬化的时间变化。结合各种模式——并添加新的疾病生物标志物——可能有必要掌握个体受试者和患者群体的完整复杂血管表型图谱——“表型组学”。在评估新的决定因素和新的治疗方法时,为了选择最合适的治疗方式,考虑特定动脉粥样硬化表型的生物学和临床相关性是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书