A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of efficacy of a new form of carbamazepine (Carbatrol) in refractory epileptic patients.

Polish journal of pharmacology Pub Date : 2004-03-01
Wojciech Sobaniec, Wojciech Kułak, Joanna Smigielska-Kuzia, Leszek Boćkowski, Jerzy Majkowski, Joanna Jedrzejczak
{"title":"A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of efficacy of a new form of carbamazepine (Carbatrol) in refractory epileptic patients.","authors":"Wojciech Sobaniec,&nbsp;Wojciech Kułak,&nbsp;Joanna Smigielska-Kuzia,&nbsp;Leszek Boćkowski,&nbsp;Jerzy Majkowski,&nbsp;Joanna Jedrzejczak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbatrol (CBR) is a new multiple-unit, sustained-release dosage form of carbamazepine (CBZ) developed by Pharmavene. We present a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind parallel group study (No PI 101) carried out in two centers in Poland. CBR was evaluated in 47 patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures. During the 28-day baseline period, patients were required to have at least two seizures and to take CBZ at a therapeutic level, a second antiepileptic drug was allowed but not valproic acid (VPA ). Patients were randomized to VPA or to CBR (dosages 800, 1200, 1600 mg/day). Criteria for escape relative to baseline were: two-fold increase in monthly seizure frequency, two-fold increase in 2-day seizure frequency, two-fold increase in weekly seizure frequency, single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCs) if none occurred during baseline or prolongation of GTCs. The primary efficacy variable was the number of patients escaping in each treatment group. Nineteen patients on VPAand 7 on CBR met escape criteria. CBR adverse experiences were all mild or moderate in severity. CBR therapy was effective in the treatment of partial complex seizures with or without generalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20292,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of pharmacology","volume":"56 2","pages":"195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbatrol (CBR) is a new multiple-unit, sustained-release dosage form of carbamazepine (CBZ) developed by Pharmavene. We present a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind parallel group study (No PI 101) carried out in two centers in Poland. CBR was evaluated in 47 patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures. During the 28-day baseline period, patients were required to have at least two seizures and to take CBZ at a therapeutic level, a second antiepileptic drug was allowed but not valproic acid (VPA ). Patients were randomized to VPA or to CBR (dosages 800, 1200, 1600 mg/day). Criteria for escape relative to baseline were: two-fold increase in monthly seizure frequency, two-fold increase in 2-day seizure frequency, two-fold increase in weekly seizure frequency, single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCs) if none occurred during baseline or prolongation of GTCs. The primary efficacy variable was the number of patients escaping in each treatment group. Nineteen patients on VPAand 7 on CBR met escape criteria. CBR adverse experiences were all mild or moderate in severity. CBR therapy was effective in the treatment of partial complex seizures with or without generalization.

一项多中心、安慰剂对照、双盲研究一种新型卡马西平(卡巴罗)治疗难治性癫痫患者的疗效。
Carbatrol (CBR)是pharmacavene公司开发的卡马西平(carbamazepine, CBZ)多单位缓释剂型。我们提出了一项多中心、门诊、随机、双盲平行组研究(No PI 101),在波兰的两个中心进行。对47例不受控制的部分发作性癫痫患者进行了CBR评估。在28天的基线期,患者被要求至少有两次癫痫发作,并服用CBZ治疗水平,允许使用第二种抗癫痫药物,但不允许丙戊酸(VPA)。患者随机分为VPA组和CBR组(剂量分别为800、1200、1600 mg/天)。相对于基线的逃逸标准是:月发作频率增加2倍,2天发作频率增加2倍,每周发作频率增加2倍,如果基线期间或gtc延长期间没有发生,则单次全身性强直-阵挛发作(gtc)。主要疗效变量为各治疗组的逃逸患者数。vpa19例,CBR 7例符合逃脱标准。CBR不良经历的严重程度均为轻度或中度。CBR治疗在部分复杂发作的治疗中是有效的,有或没有泛化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书