Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of testing for angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype before starting beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor therapy in men.

Anke Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Olaf H Klungel, Bruno H Ch Stricker, David L Veenstra, John J P Kastelein, Albert Hofman, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Hubertus G M Leufkens, Cornelia M van Duijn, Anthonius de Boer
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of testing for angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype before starting beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor therapy in men.","authors":"Anke Hilse Maitland-van der Zee,&nbsp;Olaf H Klungel,&nbsp;Bruno H Ch Stricker,&nbsp;David L Veenstra,&nbsp;John J P Kastelein,&nbsp;Albert Hofman,&nbsp;Jacqueline C M Witteman,&nbsp;Hubertus G M Leufkens,&nbsp;Cornelia M van Duijn,&nbsp;Anthonius de Boer","doi":"10.1097/00008571-200401000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of screening men for their angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-genotype before starting statin therapy. We used a combination of decision-analytic and Markov modelling techniques to evaluate the long-term incremental clinical and economic effects associated with genetic testing of men with hypercholesterolemia before starting treatment with statins. The study was performed from a health care payer perspective. We used data from the Rotterdam study, a prospective population-based cohort study in the Netherlands, which was started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years and older. Men treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs at baseline or with a baseline total cholesterol > or = 6.5 mmol/l were included. The ratio of difference in lifelong costs between the screening strategy and the no screening strategy to difference in life expectancy between these strategies was calculated. We also performed a cost-utility analysis. The base case was a 55-year-old man with hypercholesterolemia who was initially untreated. Several univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. All costs were discounted with an annual rate of 5%. Screening men for their ACE-genotype was the dominant strategy for the base case analysis, because the screening strategy saved money (851 Euro), but life expectancy was not changed. Screening was the dominant strategy for all age-groups in our cohort. Even in 80-year-old subjects, with the shortest life-expectancy, it was cheaper to screen than to give lifelong treatment to men with a DD genotype without success. Even if all DD subjects were treated with other (non-statin) cholesterol-lowering drugs, screening remained the cost-effective strategy. The results of the cost-utility analysis were similar. Discounting the effects with 5% per year also had no major impact on the conclusions. If other studies confirm that men with the DD genotype do not benefit from treatment with statins, screening for ACE genotype in men most likely will be a cost-effective strategy before initiating statin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19917,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenetics","volume":"14 1","pages":"53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008571-200401000-00006","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200401000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of screening men for their angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-genotype before starting statin therapy. We used a combination of decision-analytic and Markov modelling techniques to evaluate the long-term incremental clinical and economic effects associated with genetic testing of men with hypercholesterolemia before starting treatment with statins. The study was performed from a health care payer perspective. We used data from the Rotterdam study, a prospective population-based cohort study in the Netherlands, which was started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years and older. Men treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs at baseline or with a baseline total cholesterol > or = 6.5 mmol/l were included. The ratio of difference in lifelong costs between the screening strategy and the no screening strategy to difference in life expectancy between these strategies was calculated. We also performed a cost-utility analysis. The base case was a 55-year-old man with hypercholesterolemia who was initially untreated. Several univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. All costs were discounted with an annual rate of 5%. Screening men for their ACE-genotype was the dominant strategy for the base case analysis, because the screening strategy saved money (851 Euro), but life expectancy was not changed. Screening was the dominant strategy for all age-groups in our cohort. Even in 80-year-old subjects, with the shortest life-expectancy, it was cheaper to screen than to give lifelong treatment to men with a DD genotype without success. Even if all DD subjects were treated with other (non-statin) cholesterol-lowering drugs, screening remained the cost-effective strategy. The results of the cost-utility analysis were similar. Discounting the effects with 5% per year also had no major impact on the conclusions. If other studies confirm that men with the DD genotype do not benefit from treatment with statins, screening for ACE genotype in men most likely will be a cost-effective strategy before initiating statin therapy.

在男性开始β -羟- β -甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂治疗前检测血管紧张素转换酶基因型的药物经济学评价。
本研究旨在评估在开始他汀类药物治疗前筛查男性血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因型的潜在成本效益。我们结合决策分析和马尔可夫模型技术来评估在开始他汀类药物治疗前对高胆固醇血症患者进行基因检测的长期临床和经济影响。该研究是从医疗保健付款人的角度进行的。我们使用的数据来自荷兰鹿特丹研究,这是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,始于1990年,包括7983名年龄在55岁及以上的受试者。在基线或基线总胆固醇>或= 6.5 mmol/l时接受降胆固醇药物治疗的男性被纳入研究。计算了筛查策略和不筛查策略之间终生成本差异与这些策略之间预期寿命差异的比值。我们还进行了成本效用分析。基本病例为一名55岁男性高胆固醇血症患者,最初未接受治疗。进行了几个单变量敏感性分析。所有成本都以5%的年折现。对男性进行ace基因型筛查是基本病例分析的主要策略,因为筛查策略节省了资金(851欧元),但预期寿命没有改变。筛查是我们队列中所有年龄组的主要策略。即使是在预期寿命最短的80岁受试者中,筛查也比对患有DD基因型的男性进行终身治疗要便宜得多。即使所有的DD患者都接受了其他(非他汀类)降胆固醇药物的治疗,筛查仍然是具有成本效益的策略。成本效用分析的结果是相似的。以每年5%的折扣效应对结论也没有重大影响。如果其他研究证实DD基因型的男性不能从他汀类药物治疗中获益,那么在开始他汀类药物治疗之前,对男性进行ACE基因型筛查很可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信