Extensive resections for colorectal liver metastases.

Alessandro Ferrero, Roberto Polastri, Andrea Muratore, Daria Zorzi, Lorenzo Capussotti
{"title":"Extensive resections for colorectal liver metastases.","authors":"Alessandro Ferrero,&nbsp;Roberto Polastri,&nbsp;Andrea Muratore,&nbsp;Daria Zorzi,&nbsp;Lorenzo Capussotti","doi":"10.1007/s00534-002-0792-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Mortality and morbidity rates after liver resections have decreased with better surgical techniques and perioperative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and longterm results in patients who had undergone extensive hepatectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1985 to December 2000, 237 patients underwent 275 liver resections for colorectal metastases. Extensive liver resections were defined as follows: technical reasons (extended hepatectomies, associated vascular resections); disease extent (diameter, >>10 cm; number, >>5; associated extrahepatic resection). The total number of extensive liver resections was 74. There were 51 radical resections (68.9%), while in the nonextensive resections group, 152 resections were radical (90.7%; P = 0.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative mortality (60 days) was 1.6% (1.3% in the extensive resections group; P = 0.3), while morbidity was 22.7% (31% in the extensive resections group vs 19% in the nonextensive resections group; P = 0.1). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall actuarial survival rates were 91.8%, 44.9%, and 25.3%. The survival rates of patients who underwent an extensive resection were similar to those in the nonextensive resections group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technical difficulties and neoplastic extension are not, nowadays, a contraindication for hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, unless a radical resection is performed. Mortality and morbidity rates after liver resections have decreased with better surgical techniques and perioperative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and longterm results in patients who had undergone extensive hepatectomies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"92-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0792-9","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0792-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background/purpose: Mortality and morbidity rates after liver resections have decreased with better surgical techniques and perioperative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and longterm results in patients who had undergone extensive hepatectomies.

Methods: From January 1985 to December 2000, 237 patients underwent 275 liver resections for colorectal metastases. Extensive liver resections were defined as follows: technical reasons (extended hepatectomies, associated vascular resections); disease extent (diameter, >>10 cm; number, >>5; associated extrahepatic resection). The total number of extensive liver resections was 74. There were 51 radical resections (68.9%), while in the nonextensive resections group, 152 resections were radical (90.7%; P = 0.1).

Results: Postoperative mortality (60 days) was 1.6% (1.3% in the extensive resections group; P = 0.3), while morbidity was 22.7% (31% in the extensive resections group vs 19% in the nonextensive resections group; P = 0.1). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall actuarial survival rates were 91.8%, 44.9%, and 25.3%. The survival rates of patients who underwent an extensive resection were similar to those in the nonextensive resections group.

Conclusions: Technical difficulties and neoplastic extension are not, nowadays, a contraindication for hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, unless a radical resection is performed. Mortality and morbidity rates after liver resections have decreased with better surgical techniques and perioperative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and longterm results in patients who had undergone extensive hepatectomies.

结直肠肝转移广泛切除。
背景/目的:肝切除术后的死亡率和发病率随着手术技术和围手术期护理的改善而下降。本研究的目的是评估接受广泛肝切除术的患者的短期和长期结果。方法:1985年1月至2000年12月,237例结直肠癌患者行肝切除术275例。广泛肝切除术的定义如下:技术原因(广泛肝切除术,相关血管切除术);病变程度(直径>>10 cm;5号> >;联合肝外切除术)。广泛肝切除术共74例。根治性切除51例(68.9%),非广泛切除组根治性切除152例(90.7%);P = 0.1)。结果:术后死亡率(60天)为1.6%(广泛切除组为1.3%;P = 0.3),而发病率为22.7%(广泛切除组为31%,非广泛切除组为19%;P = 0.1)。1年、3年和5年总体精算生存率分别为91.8%、44.9%和25.3%。接受广泛切除的患者的生存率与未接受广泛切除的患者相似。结论:除非行根治性切除,否则技术困难和肿瘤扩展并不是目前结肠直肠癌肝转移的禁忌症。肝切除术后的死亡率和发病率随着手术技术和围手术期护理的改善而下降。本研究的目的是评估接受广泛肝切除术的患者的短期和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信