The comparison of effects between pulsed and CW lasers on wound healing.

Farouk A H Al-Watban, X Y Zhang
{"title":"The comparison of effects between pulsed and CW lasers on wound healing.","authors":"Farouk A H Al-Watban,&nbsp;X Y Zhang","doi":"10.1089/104454704773660921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In order to evaluate the effects of pulsed continuous wave (CW) laser and detect the role of wound healing in rats using both pulsed and CW 635-nm low-level laser therapy (LLLT), a pilot study was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Background data: </strong>Some acceleration effects of wound healing on animals were found after treatment using various lasers with CW. There are other reports, however, using pulsed CW laser to evaluate the effects of wound healing in rats.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An elliptic wound was created aseptically with a scalpel on the shaved back of the rats after anesthesia. The rats treated were restrained in a Plexiglas cage without anesthesia during the laser irradiation period. An Erchonia pulse laser (635 nm) was used in the experiment. The laser beam was delivered through an expander. The percentage of relative wound healing was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of relative wound healing was 4.32 in 100 Hz, 3.21 in 200 Hz, 3.83 in 300 Hz, 2.22 in 400 Hz, 1.73 in 500 Hz and 4.81 in CW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT using pulsed, CW laser at the appropriate dosimetry and frequency can provide acceleration in wound healing in rats. The 100-Hz frequency had a better effect than other pulse frequencies used in the study. The effects of treatment using CW laser was higher than pulse frequency. The frequency of pulsed CW laser was not found to increase wound healing in rats compared with normal CW laser, as reported in our previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/104454704773660921","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/104454704773660921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

Objective: In order to evaluate the effects of pulsed continuous wave (CW) laser and detect the role of wound healing in rats using both pulsed and CW 635-nm low-level laser therapy (LLLT), a pilot study was undertaken.

Background data: Some acceleration effects of wound healing on animals were found after treatment using various lasers with CW. There are other reports, however, using pulsed CW laser to evaluate the effects of wound healing in rats.

Materials and methods: An elliptic wound was created aseptically with a scalpel on the shaved back of the rats after anesthesia. The rats treated were restrained in a Plexiglas cage without anesthesia during the laser irradiation period. An Erchonia pulse laser (635 nm) was used in the experiment. The laser beam was delivered through an expander. The percentage of relative wound healing was calculated.

Results: The percentage of relative wound healing was 4.32 in 100 Hz, 3.21 in 200 Hz, 3.83 in 300 Hz, 2.22 in 400 Hz, 1.73 in 500 Hz and 4.81 in CW.

Conclusion: LLLT using pulsed, CW laser at the appropriate dosimetry and frequency can provide acceleration in wound healing in rats. The 100-Hz frequency had a better effect than other pulse frequencies used in the study. The effects of treatment using CW laser was higher than pulse frequency. The frequency of pulsed CW laser was not found to increase wound healing in rats compared with normal CW laser, as reported in our previous studies.

脉冲激光与连续激光对伤口愈合效果的比较。
目的:为评价脉冲连续波(CW)激光的作用,探讨脉冲连续波和连续脉冲635 nm低能级激光治疗(LLLT)对大鼠创面愈合的作用,开展了一项中试研究。背景资料:不同的激光连续波治疗对动物伤口愈合有一定的促进作用。然而,也有其他报道,使用脉冲连续激光来评估大鼠伤口愈合的影响。材料与方法:麻醉后用手术刀在大鼠剃毛背部无菌创面。治疗大鼠在激光照射期间不麻醉,置于树脂玻璃笼内。实验采用Erchonia脉冲激光(635 nm)。激光束通过膨胀器传送。计算相对创面愈合率。结果:100 Hz组相对创面愈合率为4.32,200 Hz组为3.21,300 Hz组为3.83,400 Hz组为2.22,500 Hz组为1.73,CW组为4.81。结论:在适当的剂量和频率下,脉冲连续激光对大鼠创伤愈合有促进作用。100赫兹的频率比研究中使用的其他脉冲频率效果更好。连续激光治疗效果优于脉冲频率治疗。与常规连续波激光相比,脉冲连续波激光频率未发现能促进大鼠伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信