Effectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-T brushing on the removal of root surface smear layer.

Q2 Dentistry
José Eduardo Cezar Sampaio, Ricardo Samih Georges Abi Rached, Gibson Luiz Pilatti, Letícia Helena Theodoro, Luiz Henrique Carvalho Batista
{"title":"Effectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-T brushing on the removal of root surface smear layer.","authors":"José Eduardo Cezar Sampaio,&nbsp;Ricardo Samih Georges Abi Rached,&nbsp;Gibson Luiz Pilatti,&nbsp;Letícia Helena Theodoro,&nbsp;Luiz Henrique Carvalho Batista","doi":"10.1590/s1517-74912003000400005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the removal of root surface smear layer following active application of EDTA gel and EDTA-T (texapon) gel in different concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24%), using scanning electron microscopy. A total of 220 dentin blocks obtained from the root surfaces of extracted teeth were divided into 3 groups: Group I - (control) application of saline solution (n = 20); Group II - EDTA gel (pH 7.0) was applied in the following concentrations: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24% (n = 100); Group III - EDTA-T gel (pH 7.0) applied in the same concentrations described above (n = 100). The photomicrographs were evaluated by one calibrated examiner using a smear layer removal index and following statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test). The results demonstrated that the specimens treated with EDTA and EDTA-T gel presented a better smear layer removal than the control group (p < 0.01); no statistically significant differences were observed between the EDTA and EDTA-T groups and between the concentrations tested (Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that all treatment modalities effectively removed the smear layer from the root surface. The addition of texapon into the EDTA gel formulation did not increase its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":35295,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","volume":"17 4","pages":"319-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912003000400005","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912003000400005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the removal of root surface smear layer following active application of EDTA gel and EDTA-T (texapon) gel in different concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24%), using scanning electron microscopy. A total of 220 dentin blocks obtained from the root surfaces of extracted teeth were divided into 3 groups: Group I - (control) application of saline solution (n = 20); Group II - EDTA gel (pH 7.0) was applied in the following concentrations: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24% (n = 100); Group III - EDTA-T gel (pH 7.0) applied in the same concentrations described above (n = 100). The photomicrographs were evaluated by one calibrated examiner using a smear layer removal index and following statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test). The results demonstrated that the specimens treated with EDTA and EDTA-T gel presented a better smear layer removal than the control group (p < 0.01); no statistically significant differences were observed between the EDTA and EDTA-T groups and between the concentrations tested (Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that all treatment modalities effectively removed the smear layer from the root surface. The addition of texapon into the EDTA gel formulation did not increase its effectiveness.

EDTA和EDTA- t涂刷去除根表面涂抹层的效果。
本研究的目的是通过扫描电镜比较不同浓度(5%、10%、15%、20%和24%)的EDTA凝胶和EDTA- t (texapon)凝胶在活性应用后根表面涂抹层的去除情况。取拔牙根面牙本质块220个,分为3组:第一组(对照组)应用生理盐水溶液(n = 20);II组- EDTA凝胶(pH 7.0)以5%、10%、15%、20%和24%的浓度施用(n = 100);III组- EDTA-T凝胶(pH 7.0)以上述相同浓度(n = 100)施用。显微照片由一名校准的审核员使用涂抹层去除指数和随后的统计分析(Kruskal-Wallis检验)进行评估。结果表明,EDTA和EDTA- t凝胶处理的标本比对照组有更好的去除涂片层的效果(p < 0.01);EDTA组与EDTA- t组之间及检测浓度之间差异无统计学意义(Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05)。在本研究的范围内,可以得出结论,所有的治疗方式都有效地去除了根表面的涂抹层。在EDTA凝胶配方中加入特拉蓬并没有增加其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira is a new quarterly published journal (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), with an annual supplement (Anais da Reunião de Pesquisa Odontológica da SBPqO), by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica [Brazilian Society of Odontological Research] and University of São Paulo. It replaces Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (ISSN 0103-0663).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信