Improving Care for the Ventilated Patient

Sean M. Berenholtz M.D., M.H.S. (Assistant Professor), Shelley Milanovich R.N., A.C.N.P. (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner), Amanda Faircloth R.N., B.S.N. (Staff Nurse), Donna T. Prow R.N., B.S.N. (Nurse Manager), Karen Earsing R.N., M.S. (Nurse Manager), Pamela Lipsett M.D. (Professor of Surgery), Todd Dorman M.D. (Associate Professor), Peter J. Pronovost M.D., Ph.D. (Associate Professor)
{"title":"Improving Care for the Ventilated Patient","authors":"Sean M. Berenholtz M.D., M.H.S. (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Shelley Milanovich R.N., A.C.N.P. (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner),&nbsp;Amanda Faircloth R.N., B.S.N. (Staff Nurse),&nbsp;Donna T. Prow R.N., B.S.N. (Nurse Manager),&nbsp;Karen Earsing R.N., M.S. (Nurse Manager),&nbsp;Pamela Lipsett M.D. (Professor of Surgery),&nbsp;Todd Dorman M.D. (Associate Professor),&nbsp;Peter J. Pronovost M.D., Ph.D. (Associate Professor)","doi":"10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30021-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Despite evidence that the use of specific interventions can decrease morbidity and mortality for patients receiving mechanical ventilation, a gap exists between best evidence and practice. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients who were mechanically ventilated. The study was designed to ensure that for 90% of ventilator days, patients receive processes associated with improved outcomes, including semirecumbent positioning, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The improvement model included three interventions: (1) administering a questionnaire to identify barriers to compliance with the four care processes,(2) implementing an educational intervention, and (3) implementing a checklist to be completed daily during ICU rounds to ask providers whether patients were receiving these therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 80% of nurses did not know there was evidence to support at least one of the four therapies. During the study period (March 4–April 29, 2002), the percentage of ventilator days on which patients received all four care processes increased from 30% to 96% (<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Evidence-based therapies for mechanically ventilated patients can reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84970,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30021-3","citationCount":"111","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549374104300213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111

Abstract

Context

Despite evidence that the use of specific interventions can decrease morbidity and mortality for patients receiving mechanical ventilation, a gap exists between best evidence and practice. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients who were mechanically ventilated. The study was designed to ensure that for 90% of ventilator days, patients receive processes associated with improved outcomes, including semirecumbent positioning, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.

Intervention

The improvement model included three interventions: (1) administering a questionnaire to identify barriers to compliance with the four care processes,(2) implementing an educational intervention, and (3) implementing a checklist to be completed daily during ICU rounds to ask providers whether patients were receiving these therapies.

Results

Overall, 80% of nurses did not know there was evidence to support at least one of the four therapies. During the study period (March 4–April 29, 2002), the percentage of ventilator days on which patients received all four care processes increased from 30% to 96% (p < .001).

Discussion

Evidence-based therapies for mechanically ventilated patients can reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs of care.

改善对通气病人的护理
尽管有证据表明,使用特定的干预措施可以降低机械通气患者的发病率和死亡率,但最佳证据与实践之间存在差距。一项前瞻性队列研究在外科重症监护病房(ICU)进行,包括所有机械通气的患者。该研究旨在确保在90%的呼吸机天数内,患者接受与改善预后相关的治疗,包括半卧位、每日中断镇静药物输注、消化性溃疡疾病预防和深静脉血栓预防。干预改进模型包括三个干预:(1)管理一份问卷,以确定遵守四种护理过程的障碍;(2)实施教育干预;(3)实施一份检查表,在ICU查房期间每天完成,询问提供者患者是否接受了这些治疗。结果总体而言,80%的护士不知道有证据支持四种治疗方法中的至少一种。在研究期间(2002年3月4日至4月29日),患者接受所有四种护理过程的呼吸机天数百分比从30%增加到96% (p <措施)。机械通气患者的循证治疗可以降低发病率、死亡率和护理成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书