Evaluation of promotility agents to limit the gut bioavailability of extended-release acetaminophen.

Christopher S Amato, Richard Y Wang, Robert O Wright, James G Linakis
{"title":"Evaluation of promotility agents to limit the gut bioavailability of extended-release acetaminophen.","authors":"Christopher S Amato,&nbsp;Richard Y Wang,&nbsp;Robert O Wright,&nbsp;James G Linakis","doi":"10.1081/clt-120028748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythromycin and neostigmine have both been shown to act as gastrointestinal promotility agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether either erythromycin or neostigmine, administered parenterally, would result in lower serum levels of a recently ingested drug, when compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten volunteers ingested 1300 mg of extended-release acetaminophen on each of three occasions. They were then given an intravenous dose of erythromycin (200 mg), neostigmine (2 mg), or placebo. Each volunteer received all three treatments in a counterbalanced fashion, each separated from the next by at least two weeks. Blood for serum acetaminophen concentration was drawn at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after treatment, and the serum acetaminophen elimination curves were compared for the three treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The elimination phase of the curves did not differ among the treatments as a result of administration of the prokinetic agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the present conditions, administration of erythromycin and neostigmine as prokinetic agents failed to alter the kinetics of an ingested dose of sustained-release acetaminophen.</p>","PeriodicalId":17447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","volume":"42 1","pages":"73-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1081/clt-120028748","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-120028748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Erythromycin and neostigmine have both been shown to act as gastrointestinal promotility agents.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether either erythromycin or neostigmine, administered parenterally, would result in lower serum levels of a recently ingested drug, when compared with placebo.

Methods: Ten volunteers ingested 1300 mg of extended-release acetaminophen on each of three occasions. They were then given an intravenous dose of erythromycin (200 mg), neostigmine (2 mg), or placebo. Each volunteer received all three treatments in a counterbalanced fashion, each separated from the next by at least two weeks. Blood for serum acetaminophen concentration was drawn at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after treatment, and the serum acetaminophen elimination curves were compared for the three treatments.

Results: The elimination phase of the curves did not differ among the treatments as a result of administration of the prokinetic agents.

Conclusions: Under the present conditions, administration of erythromycin and neostigmine as prokinetic agents failed to alter the kinetics of an ingested dose of sustained-release acetaminophen.

限制缓释对乙酰氨基酚肠道生物利用度的促进剂评价。
背景:红霉素和新斯的明都有胃肠促进作用。目的:本研究的目的是确定与安慰剂相比,静脉给药红霉素或新斯的明是否会导致近期摄入药物的血清水平降低。方法:10名志愿者分三次,每次服用对乙酰氨基酚1300 mg。然后给他们静脉注射红霉素(200毫克)、新斯的明(2毫克)或安慰剂。每个志愿者都以平衡的方式接受了所有三种治疗,每一种治疗与下一种治疗至少相隔两周。分别于治疗后1、2、4、6、8 h采血测定血清对乙酰氨基酚浓度,比较3种治疗组的血清对乙酰氨基酚消除曲线。结果:在不同的处理中,由于使用促动力学药物,曲线的消除期没有差异。结论:在本研究条件下,红霉素和新斯的明作为促动力学药物并不能改变对乙酰氨基酚缓释片的动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信