Volume expansion during neonatal intensive care: do we know what we are doing?

Nick Evans
{"title":"Volume expansion during neonatal intensive care: do we know what we are doing?","authors":"Nick Evans","doi":"10.1016/S1084-2756(03)00021-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although volume expansion is liberally used in newborn intensive care, we know little about its effects on hemodynamics or outcomes. Given appropriately to a truly hypovolemic baby, it can be life-saving, but the clinical diagnosis of hypovolemia is probably very inaccurate. We know that volume expansion has less effect on blood pressure than dopamine, and although it seems to produce immediate increases in systemic blood flow, we do not know for how long these increases are sustained. There is evidence to show that the routine use of volume expansion in preterm babies has no effect on outcome, and there is little evidence to support its routine use during resuscitation or the treatment of metabolic acidosis. Whether crystalloids or colloids are preferable is also unclear in newborns. In situations of concern related to circulatory compromise, if possible, define the hemodynamics echocardiographically. Otherwise, if in doubt, some volume should be given, although it is probably unwise to keep expanding the volume if this is not improving physiologic (blood pressure and heart rate) or echocardiographic systemic blood flow parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74783,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in neonatology : SN","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-2756(03)00021-6","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in neonatology : SN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084275603000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Although volume expansion is liberally used in newborn intensive care, we know little about its effects on hemodynamics or outcomes. Given appropriately to a truly hypovolemic baby, it can be life-saving, but the clinical diagnosis of hypovolemia is probably very inaccurate. We know that volume expansion has less effect on blood pressure than dopamine, and although it seems to produce immediate increases in systemic blood flow, we do not know for how long these increases are sustained. There is evidence to show that the routine use of volume expansion in preterm babies has no effect on outcome, and there is little evidence to support its routine use during resuscitation or the treatment of metabolic acidosis. Whether crystalloids or colloids are preferable is also unclear in newborns. In situations of concern related to circulatory compromise, if possible, define the hemodynamics echocardiographically. Otherwise, if in doubt, some volume should be given, although it is probably unwise to keep expanding the volume if this is not improving physiologic (blood pressure and heart rate) or echocardiographic systemic blood flow parameters.

新生儿重症监护期间的体积扩张:我们知道我们在做什么吗?
虽然容量扩张在新生儿重症监护中被广泛使用,但我们对其对血流动力学或结果的影响知之甚少。适当地给予一个真正的低血容量的婴儿,它可以挽救生命,但临床诊断低血容量可能是非常不准确的。我们知道容量扩张对血压的影响比多巴胺要小,尽管它似乎能立即增加全身血流量,但我们不知道这种增加能持续多久。有证据表明,在早产儿中常规使用容积扩张对预后没有影响,并且很少有证据支持在复苏或代谢性酸中毒治疗期间常规使用容积扩张。在新生儿中,晶体还是胶体更可取尚不清楚。如果可能,在与循环损害有关的情况下,用超声心动图确定血流动力学。否则,如果有疑问,则应给予一定的容积,尽管如果不能改善生理(血压和心率)或超声心动图系统血流参数,则继续扩大容积可能是不明智的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信