Phenotypic resistance testing.

Massimo Andreoni
{"title":"Phenotypic resistance testing.","authors":"Massimo Andreoni","doi":"10.1080/03008870310009632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of automated assay technology for rapid genotypic and phenotypic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in plasma samples now makes it feasible to use these assays in the management of antiretroviral therapy. In particular, phenotypic assays measure the drug susceptibility of the virus by determining the concentration of drug that inhibits viral replication in tissue culture. Recent experiences suggest that interpreting phenotypes may be more complicated than originally believed. Thus, rather than considering drugs as active or inactive on the basis of cut-offs, it would be more reasonable to consider their relative activity. To complicate matters further, a relatively high incidence of discordance between phenotypic and genotypic results when both tests were performed on plasma samples of antiretroviral treated patients has been reported. These findings could have considerable clinical significance, because the choice of drug regimen could differ depending on which test is used. The result of phenotypic testing may be more important when considering discordant results, because this provides a more quantitative assessment of resistance. However, clinical validation will be necessary to delineate which approach is better.</p>","PeriodicalId":76520,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","volume":"106 ","pages":"35-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03008870310009632","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008870310009632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The development of automated assay technology for rapid genotypic and phenotypic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in plasma samples now makes it feasible to use these assays in the management of antiretroviral therapy. In particular, phenotypic assays measure the drug susceptibility of the virus by determining the concentration of drug that inhibits viral replication in tissue culture. Recent experiences suggest that interpreting phenotypes may be more complicated than originally believed. Thus, rather than considering drugs as active or inactive on the basis of cut-offs, it would be more reasonable to consider their relative activity. To complicate matters further, a relatively high incidence of discordance between phenotypic and genotypic results when both tests were performed on plasma samples of antiretroviral treated patients has been reported. These findings could have considerable clinical significance, because the choice of drug regimen could differ depending on which test is used. The result of phenotypic testing may be more important when considering discordant results, because this provides a more quantitative assessment of resistance. However, clinical validation will be necessary to delineate which approach is better.

表型抗性试验。
在血浆样本中快速测定人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)基因型和表型的自动化检测技术的发展,使得在抗逆转录病毒治疗的管理中使用这些检测成为可能。特别是,表型分析通过确定组织培养中抑制病毒复制的药物浓度来测量病毒的药物敏感性。最近的经验表明,解释表型可能比最初认为的要复杂得多。因此,与其根据截止值来考虑药物的活性或非活性,不如考虑它们的相对活性更为合理。使问题进一步复杂化的是,据报道,当对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者的血浆样本进行两种检测时,表型和基因型结果之间的不一致发生率相对较高。这些发现可能具有相当大的临床意义,因为药物方案的选择可能因使用哪种测试而有所不同。当考虑到不一致的结果时,表型检测的结果可能更重要,因为这提供了更定量的抗性评估。然而,临床验证是必要的,以确定哪种方法更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信