Identifying "appropriate" applicants for home and community based services: the MI Choice screening system.

Brant E Fries, Mary James
{"title":"Identifying \"appropriate\" applicants for home and community based services: the MI Choice screening system.","authors":"Brant E Fries,&nbsp;Mary James","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research brief describes an initiative to design and test a screening system for Michigan's home and community based (HCBS) long-term care programs. The core of the system is 32 items from the Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC), 1 which can be used as a series of questions asked over the telephone or as part of a complete assessment. The telephone screen is used to direct some individuals immediately to information and referral services, while others, determined to be potentially eligible for supportive services, receive an in-person evaluation that, among other things, suggests the \"most appropriate\" level of care. Testing of the system found that nearly a quarter of callers seeking long-term care assistance did not require costly in-person assessments. It also found that the MI Choice screening algorithm performed far better than other screening tools in predicting the appropriate level of care, as determined by the expert opinion of \"gold standard\" care managers. The study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and conducted through a collaboration of the Michigan Department of Community Health, the University of Michigan, and Boston's Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged.</p>","PeriodicalId":87131,"journal":{"name":"Policy brief (Center for Home Care Policy and Research (U.S.))","volume":" 13","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy brief (Center for Home Care Policy and Research (U.S.))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research brief describes an initiative to design and test a screening system for Michigan's home and community based (HCBS) long-term care programs. The core of the system is 32 items from the Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC), 1 which can be used as a series of questions asked over the telephone or as part of a complete assessment. The telephone screen is used to direct some individuals immediately to information and referral services, while others, determined to be potentially eligible for supportive services, receive an in-person evaluation that, among other things, suggests the "most appropriate" level of care. Testing of the system found that nearly a quarter of callers seeking long-term care assistance did not require costly in-person assessments. It also found that the MI Choice screening algorithm performed far better than other screening tools in predicting the appropriate level of care, as determined by the expert opinion of "gold standard" care managers. The study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and conducted through a collaboration of the Michigan Department of Community Health, the University of Michigan, and Boston's Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged.

确定家庭和社区服务的“合适”申请人:MI选择筛选系统。
本研究简述了一项为密歇根州家庭和社区(HCBS)长期护理项目设计和测试筛选系统的倡议。该系统的核心是来自家庭护理最低数据集(MDS-HC)的32个项目,这些项目可以作为电话询问的一系列问题,也可以作为完整评估的一部分。电话筛选用于指导一些人立即获得信息和转诊服务,而其他被确定可能有资格获得支助服务的人则接受当面评价,除其他外,该评价建议“最适当”的护理水平。对该系统的测试发现,近四分之一寻求长期护理援助的来电者不需要昂贵的当面评估。它还发现,MI选择筛选算法在预测适当的护理水平方面比其他筛选工具要好得多,正如“金标准”护理经理的专家意见所确定的那样。这项研究得到了罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会的支持,并由密歇根社区卫生部、密歇根大学和波士顿希伯来老年人康复中心合作进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信