A comparison of student outcomes following problem-based learning instruction versus traditional lecture learning in a graduate pharmacology course.

Sally K Miller
{"title":"A comparison of student outcomes following problem-based learning instruction versus traditional lecture learning in a graduate pharmacology course.","authors":"Sally K Miller","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00347.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if there would be a difference in students' performance and level of satisfaction when taught pharmacology in a problem-based learning format as compared to traditional lecture format.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Control (n = 12) and experimental (n = 10) group means for middle-of-term examinations, final examinations, end-of-course numerical averages, and numerical scores of satisfaction were analyzed with a t test for statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups for any of the items measured, suggesting that problem-based learning and traditional lecture format may be equally effective course delivery methods. Replication with a larger sample is recommended.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The small sample size precludes generalizing results to the entire population, but outcomes of this pilot study suggest that problem-based learning may be at least as effective as traditional lecture and should be explored in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"15 12","pages":"550-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00347.x","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00347.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if there would be a difference in students' performance and level of satisfaction when taught pharmacology in a problem-based learning format as compared to traditional lecture format.

Data sources: Control (n = 12) and experimental (n = 10) group means for middle-of-term examinations, final examinations, end-of-course numerical averages, and numerical scores of satisfaction were analyzed with a t test for statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between groups for any of the items measured, suggesting that problem-based learning and traditional lecture format may be equally effective course delivery methods. Replication with a larger sample is recommended.

Implications: The small sample size precludes generalizing results to the entire population, but outcomes of this pilot study suggest that problem-based learning may be at least as effective as traditional lecture and should be explored in larger studies.

在药理学研究生课程中,学生采用基于问题的学习方式与传统课堂学习方式的效果比较。
目的:确定以问题为基础的学习形式教授药理学与传统的讲座形式相比,学生的表现和满意度是否有差异。资料来源:对照组(n = 12)和试验组(n = 10)的期中考试、期末考试、期末数值平均和满意度数值得分采用t检验,差异有统计学意义。结论:在测量的任何项目上,各组之间没有显著差异,这表明基于问题的学习和传统的讲座形式可能是同样有效的课程交付方法。建议使用更大的样本进行复制。启示:小样本量排除了将结果推广到整个人群的可能性,但该试点研究的结果表明,基于问题的学习可能至少与传统讲座一样有效,应该在更大规模的研究中进行探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信