Reasonable modification or fundamental alteration? Recent developments in ADA caselaw and implications for behavioral health policy.

Sara Rosenbaum, Joel Teitelbaum, D Richard Mauery, Alexandra Stewart
{"title":"Reasonable modification or fundamental alteration? Recent developments in ADA caselaw and implications for behavioral health policy.","authors":"Sara Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Joel Teitelbaum,&nbsp;D Richard Mauery,&nbsp;Alexandra Stewart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This issue brief examines the concept of fundamental alteration under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); specifically it considers when proposed modifications of public programs under Title II of the ADA will be considered to amount to the type of fundamental alteration that lies beyond judicial power to compel. The issue of when a program change constitutes a fundamental alteration is important in state community integration planning efforts, since these types of changes will require legislative action.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 21","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This issue brief examines the concept of fundamental alteration under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); specifically it considers when proposed modifications of public programs under Title II of the ADA will be considered to amount to the type of fundamental alteration that lies beyond judicial power to compel. The issue of when a program change constitutes a fundamental alteration is important in state community integration planning efforts, since these types of changes will require legislative action.

合理的修改还是根本的改变?《美国残疾人法》案例法的最新发展及其对行为健康政策的影响。
本期简要探讨了《美国残疾人法》(ADA)下的基本改变概念;具体来说,它考虑到根据《美国残疾人法》第二章提出的公共项目修改是否会被认为是司法权力无法强制的根本改变。在州社区整合规划工作中,项目变化何时构成根本性改变的问题非常重要,因为这些类型的变化将需要立法行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信