Report of a Scientific Working Group on Serious Adverse Events following Mectizan(R) treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas.

{"title":"Report of a Scientific Working Group on Serious Adverse Events following Mectizan(R) treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas.","authors":"","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-2-S1-S2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The occurrence of Serious Adverse Experiences (SAEs) following Mectizan(R) treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas has been increasingly reported over the past decade. These SAEs include a severely disabling, and potentially fatal, encephalopathy, which appears to correlate with a high load of L. loa microfilariae (> 30,000 mf/ml).Previous consultations organized by the Mectizan(R) Donation Program (MDP) in 1995 and 1999 have developed useful \"case\" definitions of encephalopathic SAEs following Mectizan(R) treatment and have summarized available evidence on its pathogenesis and optimal clinical management. At both meetings, the need for better understanding of the pathogenesis of the encephalopathy was emphasized, including the need for biological and autopsy specimens from the affected cases.Following a recommendation at the Joint Action Forum of the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control in December 2001, the MDP, on behalf of the Mectizan(R) Expert Committee, organized a Scientific Working Group on L. loa associated SAEs following Mectizan(R) treatment in May 2002. The present report includes the background, new evidence, conclusions and recommendations from that Scientific Working Group. The following points represent a summary of the present status:1. Although there are more and better quality clinical and epidemiological data on L. loa, the pathogenesis of the Mectizan(R)-related L. loa encephalopathy remains obscure.2. Very limited progress has been made in research on the pathogenesis of encephalopathy, because of the lack of specimens from cases, and the lack of animal models.3. There has been no particular breakthrough in terms of the medical management of patients with L. loa encephalopathy; however, a favorable outcome usually results from prompt general nursing and nutritional care which remain the major interventions.The main recommendations for future actions are as follows:1. Validate and update the mapping of L. loa with a combination of remote sensing and RAPLOA techniques.2. Conduct an expert analysis of the apparent clustering of encephalopathic SAEs reported so far.3. Investigate a possible \"pre-treatment\" scheme with high-dose albendazole in L. loa endemic communities at high risk of encephalopathic SAEs if treated with Mectizan(R); this study will be conducted in collaboration with WHO/TDR.4. Establish a post of Loiasis Technical Advisor for research and operational support in Cameroon, to conduct population surveys and to facilitate better data collection from SAE cases, including postmortem studies as appropriate.5. Investigate the possibility of developing an animal model of L. loa encephalopathy; this activity would be linked to the above-mentioned research agenda in Cameroon.6. Investigate the best care model for encephalopathic SAEs, including identification of early warning signs and therapeutic interventions.7. Develop further models for health education messages needed for community compliance with Mectizan(R) treatment, and family support for SAE cases.8. Conduct research studies on the safety of combination therapy of Mectizan(R) and albendazole in areas co-endemic for L. loa and lymphatic filariasis (LF) with coordination from the relevant technical bodies that oversee these issues.The above recommendations will be implemented through a continuing collaboration between the interested parties represented at the Scientific Working Group, involved in onchocerciasis control and/or the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"2 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-2-S1-S2","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-2-S1-S2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The occurrence of Serious Adverse Experiences (SAEs) following Mectizan(R) treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas has been increasingly reported over the past decade. These SAEs include a severely disabling, and potentially fatal, encephalopathy, which appears to correlate with a high load of L. loa microfilariae (> 30,000 mf/ml).Previous consultations organized by the Mectizan(R) Donation Program (MDP) in 1995 and 1999 have developed useful "case" definitions of encephalopathic SAEs following Mectizan(R) treatment and have summarized available evidence on its pathogenesis and optimal clinical management. At both meetings, the need for better understanding of the pathogenesis of the encephalopathy was emphasized, including the need for biological and autopsy specimens from the affected cases.Following a recommendation at the Joint Action Forum of the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control in December 2001, the MDP, on behalf of the Mectizan(R) Expert Committee, organized a Scientific Working Group on L. loa associated SAEs following Mectizan(R) treatment in May 2002. The present report includes the background, new evidence, conclusions and recommendations from that Scientific Working Group. The following points represent a summary of the present status:1. Although there are more and better quality clinical and epidemiological data on L. loa, the pathogenesis of the Mectizan(R)-related L. loa encephalopathy remains obscure.2. Very limited progress has been made in research on the pathogenesis of encephalopathy, because of the lack of specimens from cases, and the lack of animal models.3. There has been no particular breakthrough in terms of the medical management of patients with L. loa encephalopathy; however, a favorable outcome usually results from prompt general nursing and nutritional care which remain the major interventions.The main recommendations for future actions are as follows:1. Validate and update the mapping of L. loa with a combination of remote sensing and RAPLOA techniques.2. Conduct an expert analysis of the apparent clustering of encephalopathic SAEs reported so far.3. Investigate a possible "pre-treatment" scheme with high-dose albendazole in L. loa endemic communities at high risk of encephalopathic SAEs if treated with Mectizan(R); this study will be conducted in collaboration with WHO/TDR.4. Establish a post of Loiasis Technical Advisor for research and operational support in Cameroon, to conduct population surveys and to facilitate better data collection from SAE cases, including postmortem studies as appropriate.5. Investigate the possibility of developing an animal model of L. loa encephalopathy; this activity would be linked to the above-mentioned research agenda in Cameroon.6. Investigate the best care model for encephalopathic SAEs, including identification of early warning signs and therapeutic interventions.7. Develop further models for health education messages needed for community compliance with Mectizan(R) treatment, and family support for SAE cases.8. Conduct research studies on the safety of combination therapy of Mectizan(R) and albendazole in areas co-endemic for L. loa and lymphatic filariasis (LF) with coordination from the relevant technical bodies that oversee these issues.The above recommendations will be implemented through a continuing collaboration between the interested parties represented at the Scientific Working Group, involved in onchocerciasis control and/or the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis.

罗阿罗亚州流行地区mectizen (R)治疗盘尾丝虫病后严重不良事件科学工作组报告。
在过去的十年中,罗阿罗阿流行地区在Mectizan(R)治疗盘尾丝虫病后发生的严重不良经历(SAEs)的报道越来越多。这些sae包括严重致残和潜在致命的脑病,这似乎与高负荷的L. loa微丝虫病(> 30,000 mf/ml)有关。1995年和1999年,由Mectizan(R)捐赠计划(MDP)组织的会诊制定了Mectizan(R)治疗后脑病性SAEs的有用“病例”定义,并总结了有关其发病机制和最佳临床管理的现有证据。在这两次会议上,都强调需要更好地了解脑病的发病机制,包括需要从受影响的病例中提取生物和尸检标本。根据2001年12月非洲盘尾丝虫病控制规划联合行动论坛的一项建议,MDP代表Mectizan(R)专家委员会于2002年5月组织了一个关于Mectizan(R)治疗后盘尾丝虫病相关急性呼吸道感染的科学工作组。本报告包括该科学工作组的背景、新证据、结论和建议。以下几点是对现状的总结:尽管有更多和更好质量的关于L. loa的临床和流行病学资料,但与Mectizan(R)相关的L. loa脑病的发病机制仍然不清楚。由于缺乏病例标本和缺乏动物模型,对脑病发病机制的研究进展非常有限。在罗氏乳杆菌脑病患者的医疗管理方面没有特别的突破;然而,及时的一般护理和营养护理仍然是主要的干预措施,通常会产生良好的结果。对今后行动的主要建议如下:利用遥感与RAPLOA技术相结合的方法验证和更新L. loa的制图。对目前报道的明显聚集性脑病性SAEs进行专家分析。在使用Mectizan治疗后发生脑病性SAEs高风险的L. loa流行社区,调查可能的高剂量阿苯达唑“预处理”方案(R);这项研究将与WHO/TDR.4合作进行。4 .在喀麦隆设立一个路易病技术顾问职位,负责研究和业务支持,进行人口调查,并促进更好地收集SAE病例的数据,包括酌情进行尸检研究。探讨建立乳杆菌脑病动物模型的可能性;这项活动将同喀麦隆的上述研究议程联系起来。探讨脑病性SAEs的最佳护理模式,包括早期预警信号的识别和治疗干预。开发进一步的健康教育信息模型,以促进社区对Mectizan(R)治疗的依从性,并为SAE病例提供家庭支持。在监督这些问题的相关技术机构的协调下,开展关于美替赞(R)和阿苯达唑联合治疗在L. loa和淋巴丝虫病(LF)共同流行地区的安全性研究。上述建议将通过出席科学工作组、参与盘尾丝虫病控制和/或消除淋巴丝虫病全球规划的有关各方之间的持续合作来实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信