Collaborative study for establishment of a global standard for the potency assay of human anti-D immunoglobulin.

Pharmeuropa bio Pub Date : 2004-01-01
S J Thorpe, D Sands, B Fox, G Schäffner, M W Yu, M-E Behr-Gross
{"title":"Collaborative study for establishment of a global standard for the potency assay of human anti-D immunoglobulin.","authors":"S J Thorpe,&nbsp;D Sands,&nbsp;B Fox,&nbsp;G Schäffner,&nbsp;M W Yu,&nbsp;M-E Behr-Gross","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An international collaborative study aimed at establishing a global standard for the potency assay of anti-D immunoglobulin was started in 2002. 25 laboratories participated in this study run under the common aegis of the World Health Organization, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM). The potencies of three candidate materials and the US-FDA standard (lot 3) included for comparison were evaluated using AutoAnalyzer, competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (competitive EIA), flow cytometric methods or own \"in-house\" methods. Critical reagent, standardised procedures and standardised assay design were provided for either method, where appropriate. Central statistical evaluation of the potency data submitted by the participants was performed using a parallel line model. Agreement between laboratories and assay methods for all samples was observed. Intra-laboratory variability was lowest for laboratories performing flow cytometry and highest for laboratories that performed their in-house methods. Inter-laboratory variability was acceptable for all samples when assayed by AutoAnalyzer, competitive (EIA) and flow cytometric methods. It was concluded that sample A is most suitable to serve as a global standard and that sample C could serve as a reserve European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch provided that suitable stability is demonstrated. Sample A was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission at its 115th session (March 2003) as the first Ph. Eur. BRP (available from the EDQM: catalog number Y0000219) with the assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule.</p>","PeriodicalId":86996,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio","volume":"2003 2","pages":"9-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An international collaborative study aimed at establishing a global standard for the potency assay of anti-D immunoglobulin was started in 2002. 25 laboratories participated in this study run under the common aegis of the World Health Organization, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM). The potencies of three candidate materials and the US-FDA standard (lot 3) included for comparison were evaluated using AutoAnalyzer, competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (competitive EIA), flow cytometric methods or own "in-house" methods. Critical reagent, standardised procedures and standardised assay design were provided for either method, where appropriate. Central statistical evaluation of the potency data submitted by the participants was performed using a parallel line model. Agreement between laboratories and assay methods for all samples was observed. Intra-laboratory variability was lowest for laboratories performing flow cytometry and highest for laboratories that performed their in-house methods. Inter-laboratory variability was acceptable for all samples when assayed by AutoAnalyzer, competitive (EIA) and flow cytometric methods. It was concluded that sample A is most suitable to serve as a global standard and that sample C could serve as a reserve European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch provided that suitable stability is demonstrated. Sample A was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission at its 115th session (March 2003) as the first Ph. Eur. BRP (available from the EDQM: catalog number Y0000219) with the assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule.

建立人抗d免疫球蛋白效价测定全球标准的合作研究。
一项旨在建立抗d免疫球蛋白效价测定全球标准的国际合作研究于2002年启动。25个实验室参加了在世界卫生组织、美国食品和药物管理局(US-FDA)和欧洲药品质量管理局(EDQM)共同支持下进行的这项研究。使用AutoAnalyzer、竞争性酶联免疫分析(competitive EIA)、流式细胞术方法或自己的“内部”方法评估了三种候选材料和美国fda标准(批号3)的效力。在适当的情况下,为两种方法提供了关键试剂、标准化程序和标准化分析设计。使用平行线模型对参与者提交的效价数据进行中央统计评估。观察到所有样品的实验室和分析方法之间的一致性。采用流式细胞术的实验室内部变异性最低,而采用内部方法的实验室内部变异性最高。当使用AutoAnalyzer、EIA和流式细胞术检测时,所有样品的实验室间变异性均可接受。结果表明,样品A最适合作为全球标准,样品C可作为欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)的备用。生物参比制剂(BRP)批,前提是证明了合适的稳定性。样品A被Eur博士采用。委员会第115届会议(2003年3月)上的第一任博士。BRP(可从EDQM获得:目录号Y0000219),指定效价为285 IU/安瓿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信