NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.

{"title":"NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding the management and treatment of hepatitis C.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 12-member panel representing the fields of infectious diseases, gastroenterology, medical oncology, molecular genetics, geriatrics, internal medicine, and the public. In addition, experts in these same fields presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of approximately 300.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts; a systematic review of the medical literature provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and an extensive bibliography of hepatitis C research papers, prepared by the National Library of Medicine. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>Answering predefined questions, the panel drafted a statement based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The draft statement was read in its entirety on the final day of the conference and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel then met in executive session to consider these comments and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The statement was made available on the World Wide Web at http://consensus.nih.gov immediately after the conference. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C infection has diminished in the United States. This decline is largely due to a decrease in cases among IDUs for reasons that are unclear and, to a lesser extent, to testing of blood donors for HCV. The virus is transmitted by blood and such transmission now occurs primarily through injection drug use, sex with an infected partner or multiple partners, and occupational exposure. The majority of infections become chronic, and therefore the prevalence of HCV infections is high, with about 3 million Americans now estimated to be chronically infected. HCV is a leading cause of cirrhosis, a common cause of HCC and the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. The disease spectrum associated with HCV infection varies greatly. Various studies have suggested that 3 to 20 percent of chronically infected patients will develop cirrhosis over a 20-year period, and these patients are at risk for HCC. Persons who are older at the time of infection, patients with continuous exposure to alcohol, and those co-infected with HIV or HBV demonstrate accelerated progression to more advanced liver disease. Conversely, individuals infected at a younger age have little or no disease progression over several decades. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection is often suggested by abnormalities in ALT levels and is established by EIA followed by confirmatory determination of HCV RNA. Several sensitive and specific assays are now partly automated for the purposes of detecting HCV RNA and quantifying the viral level. Although there is little correlation between viral level and disease manifestations, these assays have proven useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment and, particularly, in demonstrating successful response to treatment as defined by an SVR. Liver biopsy is useful in defining baseline abnormalities of liver disease and in enabling patients and healthcare providers to reach a decision regarding antiviral therapy. Noninvasive tests do not currently provide the information that can be obtained through liver biopsy. Information on the genotype of the virus is important to guide treatment decisions. Genotype 1, most commonly found in the United States, is less amenable to treatment than genotypes 2 or 3. Therefore, clinical trials of antiviral therapies require genotyping information for appropriate stratification of subjects. Recent therapeutic trials in defined, selected populations have clearly shown that combinations of interferons and ribavirin are more effective than monotherapy. Moreover, trials using pegylated interferons have yielded improved SVR rates with similar toxicity profiles. However, results continue to show that the SVR rate is less common in patients with genotype 1 infections, higher HCV RNA levels, or more advanced stages of fibrosis. Genotype 1 infections require therapy for 48 weeks, whereas shorter treatment is feasible in genotype 2 and 3 infections. In genotype 1, the lack of an early virologic response (< 2 log decrease in HCV RNA) is associated with failure to achieve an SVR. The SVR is lower in patients with advanced liver disease than in patients without cirrhosis. Ongoing trials are exploring the usefulness of combination therapy in various populations. Preliminary experience in IDUs, individuals co-infected with HIV, children, and other special groups suggests similar responses are achievable in these populations. Patients with acute hepatitis C may be treated, but specific recommendations for antiviral treatment must await further evaluation of the rate of spontaneous clearance of the virus and determination of the optimal time to initiate treatment. Preventive measures beyond blood-banking practices include prompt identification of infected individuals, awareness of the potential for perinatal transmission, implementation of safe-injection practices, linkage of drug users to drug treatment programs, and implementation of community-based education and support programs to modify risk behavior. Some of these measures have been successfully implemented in the control of HIV infections, and it stands to reason that they would be valuable for reducing HCV transmission. Future advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C require continued vigilance concerning the transmission of this infection, extending treatment to populations not previously evaluated in treatment trials, and the introduction of more effective therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":86986,"journal":{"name":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","volume":"19 3","pages":"1-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding the management and treatment of hepatitis C.

Participants: A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 12-member panel representing the fields of infectious diseases, gastroenterology, medical oncology, molecular genetics, geriatrics, internal medicine, and the public. In addition, experts in these same fields presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of approximately 300.

Evidence: Presentations by experts; a systematic review of the medical literature provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and an extensive bibliography of hepatitis C research papers, prepared by the National Library of Medicine. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience.

Conference process: Answering predefined questions, the panel drafted a statement based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The draft statement was read in its entirety on the final day of the conference and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel then met in executive session to consider these comments and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The statement was made available on the World Wide Web at http://consensus.nih.gov immediately after the conference. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

Conclusions: The incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C infection has diminished in the United States. This decline is largely due to a decrease in cases among IDUs for reasons that are unclear and, to a lesser extent, to testing of blood donors for HCV. The virus is transmitted by blood and such transmission now occurs primarily through injection drug use, sex with an infected partner or multiple partners, and occupational exposure. The majority of infections become chronic, and therefore the prevalence of HCV infections is high, with about 3 million Americans now estimated to be chronically infected. HCV is a leading cause of cirrhosis, a common cause of HCC and the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. The disease spectrum associated with HCV infection varies greatly. Various studies have suggested that 3 to 20 percent of chronically infected patients will develop cirrhosis over a 20-year period, and these patients are at risk for HCC. Persons who are older at the time of infection, patients with continuous exposure to alcohol, and those co-infected with HIV or HBV demonstrate accelerated progression to more advanced liver disease. Conversely, individuals infected at a younger age have little or no disease progression over several decades. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection is often suggested by abnormalities in ALT levels and is established by EIA followed by confirmatory determination of HCV RNA. Several sensitive and specific assays are now partly automated for the purposes of detecting HCV RNA and quantifying the viral level. Although there is little correlation between viral level and disease manifestations, these assays have proven useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment and, particularly, in demonstrating successful response to treatment as defined by an SVR. Liver biopsy is useful in defining baseline abnormalities of liver disease and in enabling patients and healthcare providers to reach a decision regarding antiviral therapy. Noninvasive tests do not currently provide the information that can be obtained through liver biopsy. Information on the genotype of the virus is important to guide treatment decisions. Genotype 1, most commonly found in the United States, is less amenable to treatment than genotypes 2 or 3. Therefore, clinical trials of antiviral therapies require genotyping information for appropriate stratification of subjects. Recent therapeutic trials in defined, selected populations have clearly shown that combinations of interferons and ribavirin are more effective than monotherapy. Moreover, trials using pegylated interferons have yielded improved SVR rates with similar toxicity profiles. However, results continue to show that the SVR rate is less common in patients with genotype 1 infections, higher HCV RNA levels, or more advanced stages of fibrosis. Genotype 1 infections require therapy for 48 weeks, whereas shorter treatment is feasible in genotype 2 and 3 infections. In genotype 1, the lack of an early virologic response (< 2 log decrease in HCV RNA) is associated with failure to achieve an SVR. The SVR is lower in patients with advanced liver disease than in patients without cirrhosis. Ongoing trials are exploring the usefulness of combination therapy in various populations. Preliminary experience in IDUs, individuals co-infected with HIV, children, and other special groups suggests similar responses are achievable in these populations. Patients with acute hepatitis C may be treated, but specific recommendations for antiviral treatment must await further evaluation of the rate of spontaneous clearance of the virus and determination of the optimal time to initiate treatment. Preventive measures beyond blood-banking practices include prompt identification of infected individuals, awareness of the potential for perinatal transmission, implementation of safe-injection practices, linkage of drug users to drug treatment programs, and implementation of community-based education and support programs to modify risk behavior. Some of these measures have been successfully implemented in the control of HIV infections, and it stands to reason that they would be valuable for reducing HCV transmission. Future advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C require continued vigilance concerning the transmission of this infection, extending treatment to populations not previously evaluated in treatment trials, and the introduction of more effective therapies.

美国国立卫生研究院关于丙型肝炎管理的共识声明:2002。
目的:为卫生保健提供者、患者和公众提供有关丙型肝炎管理和治疗的现有数据的负责任的评估。参与者:一个非联邦、非倡导者、代表传染病、胃肠病学、医学肿瘤学、分子遗传学、老年病学、内科和公众领域的12人小组。此外,这些领域的专家还向小组和大约300名会议听众介绍了数据。证据:专家陈述;由卫生保健研究和质量机构提供的医学文献系统综述;以及由国家医学图书馆准备的大量丙型肝炎研究论文的参考书目。科学证据优先于临床轶事经验。会议过程:回答预先确定的问题,小组根据公开论坛和科学文献提出的科学证据起草了一份声明。声明草案全文在会议的最后一天宣读,并分发给专家和听众征求意见。该小组随后在执行会议上开会审议这些意见,并在会议结束时发布了一份修订后的声明。会议结束后,该声明立即在万维网http://consensus.nih.gov上公布。本声明是专家组的独立报告,不是NIH或联邦政府的政策声明。结论:在美国,新获得性丙型肝炎感染的发生率已经下降。这种下降主要是由于注射吸毒者的病例减少,原因尚不清楚,在较小程度上是由于对献血者进行丙型肝炎病毒检测。该病毒通过血液传播,现在这种传播主要通过注射毒品、与受感染的伴侣或多名伴侣发生性行为以及职业接触发生。大多数感染为慢性感染,因此HCV感染的流行率很高,目前估计约有300万美国人患有慢性感染。HCV是肝硬化的主要原因,是HCC的常见原因,也是美国肝移植的主要原因。与HCV感染相关的疾病谱系差异很大。各种研究表明,3%至20%的慢性感染患者在20年内会发展为肝硬化,这些患者有发生HCC的风险。感染时年龄较大的人、持续接触酒精的患者以及合并感染艾滋病毒或乙型肝炎病毒的患者表现出向更晚期肝病的加速进展。相反,年轻时感染的个体在几十年内很少或没有疾病进展。慢性丙型肝炎感染的诊断通常由ALT水平异常提示,并通过EIA和HCV RNA的确证测定来确定。目前,用于检测HCV RNA和定量病毒水平的几种敏感和特异性检测已部分自动化。尽管病毒水平与疾病表现之间几乎没有相关性,但这些检测已被证明有助于确定那些更有可能从治疗中受益的患者,特别是在证明SVR定义的治疗成功反应方面。肝活检有助于确定肝脏疾病的基线异常,并使患者和医疗保健提供者能够就抗病毒治疗作出决定。无创检查目前不能提供通过肝活检获得的信息。关于病毒基因型的信息对于指导治疗决策很重要。基因1型,最常见于美国,比基因2型或3型更不适合治疗。因此,抗病毒治疗的临床试验需要基因分型信息,以便对受试者进行适当的分层。最近在确定的选定人群中进行的治疗试验清楚地表明,干扰素和利巴韦林联合使用比单一治疗更有效。此外,使用聚乙二醇化干扰素的试验已经在类似毒性情况下提高了SVR率。然而,结果继续表明,SVR率在基因1型感染、HCV RNA水平较高或纤维化更晚期的患者中较少见。基因1型感染需要治疗48周,而基因2型和基因3型感染的治疗时间较短。在基因型1中,缺乏早期病毒学应答(HCV RNA降低< 2 log)与无法实现SVR相关。晚期肝病患者的SVR低于无肝硬化患者。正在进行的试验正在探索在不同人群中联合治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信